From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 17 20:24:10 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2010 00:24:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3IJ0-0006hi-DM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3IIy-0006hc-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:09 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:59520) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O3IIu-0000yt-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:04 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O3IIs-0007F3-VK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:02 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43239 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3IIq-0007Ev-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3IIo-0004XI-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:24:00 -0400 Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.152]:59260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3IIo-0004Ws-81 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:23:58 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.9.122.85]:52598 helo=Victoria.local) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1O3IIm-0004IW-GA (Exim 4.70) for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org (return-path ); Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:23:56 +0100 From: Leo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:23:54 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) I got an emacs session running 1day 12 hours and I have 2030 buffers like the following. These buffers gave me a bad feeling and I even suspected emacs was attacked. It seems they are created by rcirc-get-temp-buffer-create. ............ * #openobexTMPir... 12 Fundamental * #sumaprojektTM... 7 Fundamental * #epfarmsTMPirc... 4 Fundamental * #mycertTMPirc.... 13 Fundamental * #onaTMPirc.fre... 9 Fundamental * #ruby-huTMPirc... 10 Fundamental * #pypbTMPirc.fr... 8 Fundamental * #opensolaris-i... 8 Fundamental * #itl-osugTMPir... 8 Fundamental * #ruwaveTMPirc.... 6 Fundamental * ##davinciTMPir... 6 Fundamental * #gnu-womenTMPi... 5 Fundamental * #biosinteracti... 29 Fundamental * #joslTMPirc.fr... 9 Fundamental * #openerp-itTMP... 30 Fundamental * #yurikocmsTMPi... 9 Fundamental * #picomboTMPirc... 9 Fundamental * #sfmlTMPirc.fr... 5 Fundamental * #synapsestudio... 9 Fundamental * #web414TMPirc.... 11 Fundamental * #drupal-norgeT... 8 Fundamental * #phobosTMPirc.... 16 Fundamental * #karlsruheTMPi... 9 Fundamental * #ichthux-study... 11 Fundamental * ##rww-testTMPi... 4 Fundamental * #warfields.tre... 7 Fundamental * #archrepoTMPir... 7 Fundamental * #heritageTMPir... 10 Fundamental * #kfluidTMPirc.... 12 Fundamental * #qt-itemviews-... 12 Fundamental * #miranda-testT... 10 Fundamental * #openeverythin... 11 Fundamental * #de-communtuTM... 8 Fundamental * #blogiloTMPirc... 10 Fundamental * #hellasTMPirc.... 11 Fundamental * #hateTMPirc.fr... 10 Fundamental * #alidTMPirc.fr... 10 Fundamental * #debian-amTMPi... 12 Fundamental * #boincsynergy.... 10 Fundamental * #drupal-roTMPi... 4 Fundamental ............ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 25 18:16:03 2010 Received: (at 5966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2010 22:16:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6A7P-0000YX-IY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:16:03 -0400 Received: from pantheon-po33.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.94]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6A7N-0000YB-2Z for 5966@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:16:01 -0400 Received: from furry (bordersgroupinc-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.220.18] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po33.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o3PMFMiw014699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:15:43 -0400 Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9241C055; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:15:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: Ryan Yeske Subject: Re: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:15:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87eii35gcu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5966 Cc: 5966@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Hi Ryan, Could you look into this problem? Thanks. Leo wrote: > I got an emacs session running 1day 12 hours and I have 2030 buffers > like the following. These buffers gave me a bad feeling and I even > suspected emacs was attacked. It seems they are created by > rcirc-get-temp-buffer-create. > > * #openobexTMPir... 12 Fundamental > * #sumaprojektTM... 7 Fundamental > * #epfarmsTMPirc... 4 Fundamental > .... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 20:45:23 2010 Received: (at 5966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2010 00:45:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9pDO-0002bl-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 20:45:23 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9pC3-000238-Im for 5966@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 20:44:00 -0400 Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19so2747455pxi.3 for <5966@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:43:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Wp73gfZ8mIvfGJfY5v4vFlKYUOE/fPorQfEqljhig4=; b=M66IAw40vWQeLRZL8WaiqF3DTf//E4ermOJyFnIYPdnRyf9jboAcx/91Sg7CGrmiYs h6/2cOwO3vy6UrE4xXREnWWnLJw5HtYCbQYfm18h4fQ+jlWbu4Zgx5Moet/rseUbeZYo O9dIgjn5OnIEuzKBcPX30RulLw8GHKY1wxX7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CTMm075RInnveb6RIuvqRjzLr/BxZ9tUUV3K3QkUiwdYeoHJyploX72iRKRQsYx4eF 8zuLpmFV9zYtguQuYWbfrrX/b/UBr8aIAYHrVqf+VqOHxonQYTOVcklu5FVZEyxLU0RT kRgps+tON/wjGr+VjCUtBcYFDx8Ekw7QnWDVY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.89.8 with SMTP id r8mr6224198rvl.32.1273106632525; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.27.2 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 17:43:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eii35gcu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87eii35gcu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 17:43:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers From: Ryan Yeske To: Chong Yidong Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5966 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 May 2010 20:45:21 -0400 Cc: 5966@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I cannot reproduce this here. Leo, what server was this on? These buffers are created when the server is sending out the NAMES for a channel (response 353), and is killed when the server responds with a 366 to signify the end of names. Ryan 2010/4/25 Chong Yidong : > Hi Ryan, > > Could you look into this problem? =A0Thanks. > > Leo wrote: > >> I got an emacs session running 1day 12 hours and I have 2030 buffers >> like the following. These buffers gave me a bad feeling and I even >> suspected emacs was attacked. It seems they are created by >> rcirc-get-temp-buffer-create. >> >> =A0* =A0 #openobexTMPir... =A0 =A0 =A0 =A012 Fundamental >> =A0* =A0 #sumaprojektTM... =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 7 Fundamental >> =A0* =A0 #epfarmsTMPirc... =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 4 Fundamental >> =A0.... > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 03:21:08 2010 Received: (at 5966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2010 07:21:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9vON-0007cy-S1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 03:21:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9vOM-0007cc-Gk for 5966@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 03:21:07 -0400 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so255889wwi.3 for <5966@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 May 2010 00:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SOcPp4mLmOG+SfsLavsfvK7wCJ7EfH6TOA4eER+xMoE=; b=HBbu3ueQOdJ1rKXGhr/U5zqiUqCXJ5IJ7MXKtpHVtBb9CeO3XQ1jLwEX6noaln1hK1 9yCagQ6DEwoBEHiEV4NDCicTgb2b3wr99uXz7DXeysAxucyjKl3LCHRC/ZOgLbsBl1Pr zy8Ac4R/hdg4u6WfVhgfo9camrRyIgB+NVkT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QW6cqmiAY55U4zBTsGdHg3DlFoKFxRVsVDiqkrl0/S4fOVFYPecyo7oemmtCraPALa TEvWcTp06OojJuARHTl0KQJzNCW+PSuMLJARgQOIzmW3SLNVNSi7/T046KhoubOoRFfh gWvIrX8oA2YjiTUcblab9kuLc97XVmuZLltgs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.143 with SMTP id c15mr1241682wef.127.1273130462848; Thu, 06 May 2010 00:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.156.139 with HTTP; Thu, 6 May 2010 00:21:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87eii35gcu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:21:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers From: Leo To: Ryan Yeske Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5966 Cc: Chong Yidong , 5966@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello Ryan, It was on freenode. Unfortunately I don't know what triggers it but it did happen. Leo On 6 May 2010 01:43, Ryan Yeske wrote: > I cannot reproduce this here. > > Leo, what server was this on? > > These buffers are created when the server is sending out the NAMES for > a channel (response 353), and is killed when the server responds with > a 366 to signify the end of names. > > Ryan > > 2010/4/25 Chong Yidong : >> Hi Ryan, >> >> Could you look into this problem? =A0Thanks. >> >> Leo wrote: >> >>> I got an emacs session running 1day 12 hours and I have 2030 buffers >>> like the following. These buffers gave me a bad feeling and I even >>> suspected emacs was attacked. It seems they are created by >>> rcirc-get-temp-buffer-create. >>> >>> =A0* =A0 #openobexTMPir... =A0 =A0 =A0 =A012 Fundamental >>> =A0* =A0 #sumaprojektTM... =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 7 Fundamental >>> =A0* =A0 #epfarmsTMPirc... =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 4 Fundamental >>> =A0.... >> > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 25 22:19:39 2011 Received: (at 5966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2011 02:19:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R80nD-0000xx-Kp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:19:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com ([209.85.210.50]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R80nB-0000xo-BP for 5966@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:19:38 -0400 Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so14293988pzk.9 for <5966@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=bwXS3ZAXqkDAkCwHA3rusEu3+PDdbZKBtzHP97bqr8M=; b=m7YScDjj/4KcSLqm0FIe7uLRzi/hnUPo2uu2i+X2r6WUCIh9rDt0DxYw4ZykySWEL+ ZQkyo2V7veZ7cxUkv0a7Ryl9NKMT06EU757fM2EK4sm8tDGryT+g9NLcXuG3WJ/hbzE3 x7I2ooGUaC1yRTc/nXaOa70nRz3B4cvvjAr5s= Received: by 10.68.9.7 with SMTP id v7mr26615200pba.94.1317003535563; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Victoria.local ([123.123.253.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm68191818pbq.11.2011.09.25.19.18.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo To: Ryan Yeske Subject: Re: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers References: <87eii35gcu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:18:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Ryan Yeske's message of "Wed, 5 May 2010 17:43:52 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5966 Cc: Chong Yidong , 5966@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) On 2010-05-06 08:43 +0800, Ryan Yeske wrote: > I cannot reproduce this here. > > Leo, what server was this on? > > These buffers are created when the server is sending out the NAMES for > a channel (response 353), and is killed when the server responds with > a 366 to signify the end of names. > > Ryan In rcirc-handler-332 and rcirc-handler-333, the created TMP buffer is not killed. Do we need to patch it so that its TMP buffer is gc'd? BTW, I have only have two occurrences of this bug and still have no recipe to reproduce it. I remember it happened when I killed some rcirc buffer. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 04 17:50:50 2012 Received: (at 5966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2012 22:50:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg1KD-00074d-N1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:50:50 -0500 Received: from giraff.friprogramvarusyndikatet.se ([94.246.92.54]:56016 helo=smtp.fripost.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg1KA-00074V-MV for 5966@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:50:48 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (h-169-224.a336.priv.bahnhof.se [176.10.169.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: damd@fripost.org) by smtp.fripost.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0BF0633A7; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 23:49:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50BE7DF3.3080904@dogan.se> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:49:23 +0100 From: Deniz Dogan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sdl.web@gmail.com, rcyeske@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, 5966@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5966 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Is this still happening sometimes? Any news? Can we close it? Deniz From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 05 00:05:01 2012 Received: (at 5966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2012 05:05:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg7AK-00009P-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:05:00 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:33706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg7AI-00009I-KA for 5966@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:04:59 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z20so1980288dae.3 for <5966@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:04:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=cHrntNQkdSGMFISg70UJb1eWk8pJPZzpT91PZ5wVKHA=; b=hWvTHsGDKhp4zeSsm/mY/PiGF3ra1SN0RRIEWYzEk5a54byTfUegHJekA225a2IaRE YKIlS5LSVgsh4nOhzAySCWk0+aw72JiaSzNhR7+PmVDdKR8PZb+FOqhWDbUr/HVFpTpw 9IUxBKUW1BeCIMhYSmaevhAYMYse1PUBMkigg71w1Oif6XAhJRN+BMeP/EDIpeOPe+XD 3hzS7b+0shIqAWvAQ7MOYVDhVt50IYQWhnGsjoJZ8K/RaXKZZiuOU3/TdCfhk32BX6en C3JdLJ60qyDXn/65uKXi/uT21+f0dBbr7jiWQ9iBPyTzBnzlhCAw4NuwvaMkUyp8U/5K 9mJg== Received: by 10.68.143.129 with SMTP id se1mr46004853pbb.67.1354683891939; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([198.148.116.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i3sm2026556pav.18.2012.12.04.21.04.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:04:51 -0800 (PST) From: Leo To: Deniz Dogan Subject: Re: bug#5966: 23.1.95; rcirc creates thousands of temp buffers References: <50BE7DF3.3080904@dogan.se> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:01:30 +0800 In-Reply-To: <50BE7DF3.3080904@dogan.se> (Deniz Dogan's message of "Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:49:23 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (OS X 10.8.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5966 Cc: 5966@debbugs.gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, rcyeske@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) On 2012-12-05 06:49 +0800, Deniz Dogan wrote: > Is this still happening sometimes? Any news? Can we close it? Feel free to close it. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 05 06:30:02 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2012 11:30:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgDAw-0002Ta-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:30:02 -0500 Received: from giraff.friprogramvarusyndikatet.se ([94.246.92.54]:57444 helo=smtp.fripost.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgDAu-0002Sl-DN for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:30:00 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (h-169-224.a336.priv.bahnhof.se [176.10.169.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: damd@fripost.org) by smtp.fripost.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0826963437 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:29:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50BF3002.6080007@dogan.se> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:29:06 +0100 From: Deniz Dogan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 5966 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 5966 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject close 5966 thanks From unknown Mon Aug 18 20:14:46 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator