GNU bug report logs - #59627
29.0.50; tree-sitter support not documented in emacs manual

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 09:39:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59627: closed (29.0.50; tree-sitter support not documented in
 emacs manual)
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 23:01:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:00:19 -0800
with message-id <05A471E5-2793-4464-B97A-3B1023508ECC <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#59627: 29.0.50; tree-sitter support not documented in emacs  manual
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #59627,
regarding 29.0.50; tree-sitter support not documented in emacs manual
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
59627: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59627
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 29.0.50; tree-sitter support not documented in emacs manual
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:38:40 -0800

The new tree-sitter support is not documented in the emacs manual, only
in the elisp one.  Should it be?



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
Cc: 59627-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#59627: 29.0.50; tree-sitter support not documented in emacs 
 manual
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:00:19 -0800

Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> writes:

>> On Nov 27, 2022, at 3:41 AM, Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no> wrote:
>> 
>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> The new tree-sitter support is not documented in the emacs manual, only
>>> in the elisp one.  Should it be?
>> 
>> To me it seems like the Emacs manual covers broader strokes and
>> concepts, while tree-sitter still is "just" an internal implementation
>> detail.  I'm not sure exactly where this distinction goes, though.
>> 
>> Theo
>
> I think the plans is to add a section in the Emacs manual. There are
> some functions and variables intended to be included in the Emacs
> manual that I left out of the Elisp manual. The Emacs manual should
> also explain font-lock features.

I think there is not need to keep this open as an reminder. IIUC Eli is
working on the Emacs manual. So I’m closing this.

Yuan
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 192 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.