GNU bug report logs - #59609
29.0.50; [PATCH] Better advertise (Non-)GNU ELPA in emacs manual

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 13:45:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 29.0.50

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: rms <at> gnu.org
Cc: 59609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#59609: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Better advertise (Non-)GNU ELPA in emacs manual
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:49:47 -0800
Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org> writes:

>   > +  By default, Emacs downloads packages from GNU ELPA
>   > +(@url{https://elpa.gnu.org/}), a package archive maintained by the
>   > +Emacs developers and hosted by the GNU project.  It also downloads
>   > +packages from NonGNU ELPA (@url{https://elpa.nongnu.org/}).
>
>     I think it is ok to say this about NonGNU ELPA provided we say
>     clearly that these are packages we can't or should not include in
>     Emacs, so people should not depend on them to continue to be
>     present.

I see no risk that the packages will suddenly go away.  Under what
circumstances would that happen?

In some cases, we will delete packages from NonGNU ELPA, of course.
This is true for GNU ELPA also, and for Emacs itself.  But I don't see
why we need to get into all that in this section, where we are just
letting people know that GNU ELPA and NonGNU ELPA exist.




This bug report was last modified 156 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.