Subject: Re: bug#59603: 28.1.90; `ucs-normalize-string' fails to work

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:10:52 +0200

> From: Ihor Radchenko <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:37:47 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> I do see that uppercase symbol names may not always refer to the
> arguments, but don't `str' fit better into the conventions? It is the
> symbol to be used in the macro, after all.
> Or do I miss something?

How else do you suggest to indicate in the doc string that the macro
operates on a variable named 'str'?  Using `str' is much more confusing,
IMO.