GNU bug report logs -
#59535
suggestion for: info ls
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 59535 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 59535 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59535
; Package
coreutils
.
(Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:57:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Günter Essers <guenter.essers <at> posteo.de>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:57:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
though here
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/ls-invocation.html
I had read "Later options override earlier options that are
incompatible", at first I was a bit surprised about the different output
for 'ls -lC' and 'ls -Cl'. (I contacted your website documenting GNU
coreutils 9.1.)
u <at> host$ mkdir dummy
u <at> host$ cd dummy/
u <at> host$ touch file1
u <at> host$ ls -lC
file1
u <at> host$ ls -Cl
insgesamt 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 u u 0 23. Nov 20:31 file1
Would a remark in the manual be an exaggeration and too fussy?
My working environment: GNU coreutils 8.32, Debian 11.5.
I hope not having wasted your time. Regards
Günter
[OpenPGP_0xF50E3C1E52D754B5.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 24 Nov 2022 13:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Günter Essers <guenter.essers <at> posteo.de>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 24 Nov 2022 13:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 59535-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 23/11/2022 19:51, Günter Essers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> though here
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/ls-invocation.html
>
> I had read "Later options override earlier options that are
> incompatible", at first I was a bit surprised about the different output
> for 'ls -lC' and 'ls -Cl'. (I contacted your website documenting GNU
> coreutils 9.1.)
>
> u <at> host$ mkdir dummy
> u <at> host$ cd dummy/
> u <at> host$ touch file1
> u <at> host$ ls -lC
> file1
> u <at> host$ ls -Cl
> insgesamt 0
> -rw-r--r-- 1 u u 0 23. Nov 20:31 file1
>
> Would a remark in the manual be an exaggeration and too fussy?
>
> My working environment: GNU coreutils 8.32, Debian 11.5.
>
> I hope not having wasted your time. Regards
It's a good suggestion, which has actually already been implemented:
https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/commit/1625916a1
Note the web page is generated from the info pages of the latest release.
It's just your distro is using an old release at this stage.
Marking this as done.
thanks,
Pádraig
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 23 Dec 2022 12:24:10 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 238 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.