GNU bug report logs - #59520
[PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Abhishek Cherath <abhi <at> quic.us>

Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Abhishek Cherath <abhi <at> quic.us>
Subject: bug#59520: closed (Re: [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names.)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:08:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#59520: [PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs.

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 59520 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
59520: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59520
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Abhishek Cherath <abhi <at> quic.us>
Cc: 59520-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names.
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:02:13 +0100
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Yo,

Abhishek Cherath 写道:
> I think that makes sense to me, splitting that paragraph is 
> good, and
> adding `as produced by...` is helpful.

Thanks!  Pushed as 22d44f87763f86a05e9679d9ad2c99e17f4c79be.

> (I think a couple unrelated things ended up in your diff)

Yup.

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Abhishek Cherath <abhi <at> quic.us>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Abhishek Cherath <abhi <at> quic.us>
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs.
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:37:33 -0500
* doc/guix.texi ("Package Management")
	["Invoking guix package"]: Mention support for operating
	on store paths.
---
 doc/guix.texi | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index c0cb24d709..70c473bdf6 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -3424,9 +3424,10 @@ The @var{options} can be among the following:
 Install the specified @var{package}s.
 
 Each @var{package} may specify either a simple package name, such as
-@code{guile}, or a package name followed by an at-sign and version number,
+@code{guile}; a package name followed by an at-sign and version number,
 such as @code{guile@@1.8.8} or simply @code{guile@@1.8} (in the latter
-case, the newest version prefixed by @code{1.8} is selected).
+case, the newest version prefixed by @code{1.8} is selected); or a store path,
+such as @file{/gnu/store/qyrids57rb050vdzsdskdf7p59nlchnv-guile-1.8.8}.
 
 If no version number is specified, the
 newest available version will be selected.  In addition, @var{package}

base-commit: 7a2082023ad9c7479bfedf39537606a088222d48
-- 
2.38.1




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 240 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.