GNU bug report logs -
#59520
[PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs.
Previous Next
Reported by: Abhishek Cherath <abhi <at> quic.us>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:38:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:02:13 +0100
with message-id <87pmddb9z4.fsf <at> nckx>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] doc: Note that ‘guix package’ accepts file names.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #59520,
regarding [PATCH] doc: Note that guix package can operate on outputs.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
59520: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59520
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
* doc/guix.texi ("Package Management")
["Invoking guix package"]: Mention support for operating
on store paths.
---
doc/guix.texi | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index c0cb24d709..70c473bdf6 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -3424,9 +3424,10 @@ The @var{options} can be among the following:
Install the specified @var{package}s.
Each @var{package} may specify either a simple package name, such as
-@code{guile}, or a package name followed by an at-sign and version number,
+@code{guile}; a package name followed by an at-sign and version number,
such as @code{guile@@1.8.8} or simply @code{guile@@1.8} (in the latter
-case, the newest version prefixed by @code{1.8} is selected).
+case, the newest version prefixed by @code{1.8} is selected); or a store path,
+such as @file{/gnu/store/qyrids57rb050vdzsdskdf7p59nlchnv-guile-1.8.8}.
If no version number is specified, the
newest available version will be selected. In addition, @var{package}
base-commit: 7a2082023ad9c7479bfedf39537606a088222d48
--
2.38.1
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Yo,
Abhishek Cherath 写道:
> I think that makes sense to me, splitting that paragraph is
> good, and
> adding `as produced by...` is helpful.
Thanks! Pushed as 22d44f87763f86a05e9679d9ad2c99e17f4c79be.
> (I think a couple unrelated things ended up in your diff)
Yup.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 241 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.