GNU bug report logs - #59459
29.0.50; Compilation warnings without tree-sitter

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 59459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 59459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 59459-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59459: 29.0.50; Compilation warnings without tree-sitter
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:22:10 -0800

> On Nov 22, 2022, at 4:21 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:01:14 -0800
>> 
>> [Continuing from bug#59426]
>> 
>> Those warnings are due to no-tree-sitter build not having functions
>> defined in treesit.c. Eli fixed those warnings by adding
>> declare-function’s in every file using those functions. Can we make it a
>> bit nicer for lisp developers? Maybe defining those functions with
>> dummies with something like
>> 
>> (defun xxx
>> (error ’treesit "Tree-sitter not available"))
>> 
>> ?
> 
> I'm not sure this is justified.  The cases where a build lacks a very large
> group of primitives references in *.el files are quite rare in our practice;
> about the only two examples I know of are xwidgets.el and treesit.el (plus
> modes which use tree-sitter).  It's easy enough (albeit annoying) to add a
> few declare-function's, so unless we are going to have more and more of
> these cases, adding a whole new infrastructure, let alone tricks like the
> above, which will raise a lot of brows, sound excessive to me.

If it cannot be easily done with existing tools, then I agree declare-function is good enough.

Thanks,
Yuan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.