GNU bug report logs - #59458
[PATCH] Fix tracing for advanced scoring

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Łukasz Stelmach <stlman <at> poczta.fm>

Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:32:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 59458 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>,
 59458 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Łukasz Stelmach <stlman <at> poczta.fm>
Subject: Re: bug#59458: [PATCH] Fix tracing for advanced scoring
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:07:57 -0700
Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Cc: Łukasz Stelmach <stlman <at> poczta.fm>
>>> From: Łukasz Stelmach <stlman <at> poczta.fm>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 22:30:55 +0100
>>>
>>> * lisp/gnus/gnus-logic.el (gnus-score-advanced): Move the tracing
>>> code outside of if so it's executed for both branches.
>
> I'm not very familiar with this code (this is actually the first I'm
> hearing of gnus-logic.el), so I hope Lars will chime in. It makes sense
> that tracing should happen whether or not the rule matched? But what
> about the sexp before that? Would we be pushing the mail-header-number
> and new score to `gnus-newsgroup-score' only if the rule *wasn't*
> successful?
>
> I think this one should wait for Lars. If we don't hear from him and
> it's holding things up, I can look more closely.

Eric,

It would be great if you could help review this.  Thanks in advance.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 346 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.