GNU bug report logs - #59388
Open emacsclient file at last line

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Janek F <xerusx <at> pm.me>

Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:45:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: gregory <at> heytings.org, xerusx <at> pm.me, 59388 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59388: Open emacsclient file at last line
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:00:20 +0200
> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:49:10 -0800
> Cc: gregory <at> heytings.org, xerusx <at> pm.me, 59388 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
> 
> > Then I think I'm okay with adding --funcall to emacsclient, as a solution
> > for this feature request.  With the proviso that the named function will be
> > called _after_ visiting the named FILE, right?
> 
> Assuming it's possible, I think the most flexible, obvious, and 
> consistent[1] way for it to work would be to obey the order of the 
> arguments. So "emacsclient --funcall func file.txt" calls func and then 
> visits file.txt, whereas "emacsclient file.txt --funcall func" visits 
> file.txt and then calls func.

This won't work, because emacsclient thinks everything after the first FILE
cannot be an option.  Which is why +LINE:COLUMN FILE works, although LINE
and COLUMN refer to FILE that comes after it.

We can invoke functions in the order of --funcall's, but they should run
after visiting the file.  Nothing else makes sense, and was never possible
with emacsclient anyway.

So I stand by what I wrote: --funcall'ed functions should run after
visiting FILE.  It's not a problem, as you can see from the implementation
of -position in the protocol.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 204 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.