GNU bug report logs - #59372
[PATCH] gnu: peek: Add missing input.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #40 received at 59372 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59372 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Subject: Re: [bug#59372] [PATCH] gnu: peek: Add missing input.
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:38:04 -0600

On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:13:26 +0100 zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for resuming #51202. :-)
> 
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 03:50, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > As far as I can tell, this change doesn't affect the peek 
> > package's output at all.  Am I mistaken?  What should the 
> > observable difference be, beyond ‘working’?
> 
> Peek needs to be propagated.  An issue is open,

I read through the open issue. Should I send a patch implementing lilyp's suggestion?

That's what I was also thinking of doing but I also had the question
regarding choosing between ffmpeg or gnome-shell. Should we prefer
ffmpeg? Would be cool if we could support choosing between ffmpeg or
gnome-shell.

Is there currently a way to do that?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.