Subject: Re: bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables

From: Leo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:35:22 +0800

On 2011-03-28 23:09 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I'd rather call edit-abbrevs-redefine from the new command you'll bind
> to C-x C-w.

Do you mean 'C-x C-s'? C-x C-w is bound to write-abbrev-file in the
patch? If so, I guess it makes sense not to bind C-x C-w.

Leo