GNU bug report logs - #59338
29.0.50; Commit 1a2d603bb3 breaks Eglot on Windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 59565

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #35 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>
Cc: arash <at> gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, danny <at> dfreeman.email,
 59338 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59338: 29.0.50; Commit 1a2d603bb3 breaks Eglot on Windows
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:14:18 +0200
> From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>,
>   59338 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:12:05 -0500
> 
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 17:27, Danny Freeman wrote:
> 
> I also think that calling `url-generic-parse-url' might be overkill
> here.  Based on
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier#Syntax I would
> just test if `path' matches "\\`[A-Za-z][+.0-9A-Za-z-]+:".

Not sure I understand why this matters in the context of this
discussion.  We need to make eglot--path-to-uri produce valid file://
URL on MS-Windows and on Posix systems, right?  Then why does it
matter how URI schema are defined?  What am I missing?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 231 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.