GNU bug report logs - #59314
29.0.50; EUDC and message-mode header completion

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>

Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Full log


Message #83 received at 59314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim <at> fitzsim.org>
To: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf <at> condition-alpha.com>
Cc: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>, 59314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59314: 29.0.50; EUDC and message-mode header completion
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 22:14:10 -0500
Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim <at> fitzsim.org> writes:

> Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf <at> condition-alpha.com> writes:
>
>> Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim <at> fitzsim.org> writes:
>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> Looking at this now.
>>>
>>> Great, thank you.
>>> [...]
>>
>> With the default value of `completion-styles`, which is
>>
>>      '(basic partial-completion emacs22)
>>
>> I get no completion. But when setting it to
>>
>>      '(substring partial-completion)
>>
>> as I mentioned, I get this after calling `completion-at-point:`
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To:  <emacs-ert-test-
>> Subject: 
>> From: Alexander Adolf <alexanderadolf <at> laptop.fritz.box>
>> --text follows this line--
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Which I guess is kind of the expected result, as it inserts the longest
>> common prefix of the two candidates' email addresses.
>>
>> I get the same result with `message-tab` (or just pressing TAB), btw.
>>
>> Actually, I think the leading "<" should not be there? After appending
>> either "3", or "4" further completion attempts (using either function)
>> do not provide any results. But when I remove the leading "<", and try
>> to complete again (with either "3" or "4" added), I get the correct
>> result (for instance "Emacs ERT4 <emacs-ert-test-4 <at> bbdb.gnu.org>").
>>
>> Thus, it seems there are two things to further look into :
>>
>> - set `completion-styles` to '(substring partial-completion) during the
>>   test
>>
>> - make sure the leading "<" is not inserted when there is a partial
>>   match
>
> Confirmed, adding substring to completion-styles, anywhere in the list, e.g.:
>
> (setq completion-styles '(basic substring partial-completion emacs22))
>
> results in the behaviour you describe.  We need to make this work with
> the default completion-styles setting though.
>
> I wonder where the leading " <" comes from (a space character is also
> inserted, before the '<').

If I remove this line from message.el:

(add-hook 'completion-at-point-functions #'eudc-capf-complete -1 t)

and rebuild Emacs, then my recipe works, via:

message-tab -...-> message-expand-name -> eudc-expand-inline

The EUDC multi-selector UI is invoked allowing me to choose between
emacs-ert-test-3 and emacs-ert-test-4, and the full name and email
address is inserted correctly.  This is with completion-styles left at
its default value.

So that's one code path validated, phew.

The next one I'd like to get working is a similar recipe (again, with
eudc-capf-complete not present in message's
completion-at-point-functions):

HOME=`pwd`/test emacs
C-: (setq message-expand-name-standard-ui t)
C-: (eudc-set-server "localhost" 'bbdb t)
C-x m
emacs-ertTAB

Then I get " <emacs-ert-test-", the same as your result, in the absence
of eudc-capf-complete.  This seems to be caused by misinterpreting the
results of eudc-query-with-words.  What is 'message--name-table'
supposed to return, what is it returning, and why is its return value
producing " <..." in the output?  I could use your input on how
completion-at-point is supposed to work here.

Thank you,
Thomas




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 127 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.