GNU bug report logs - #59214
[PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: "M. Ian Graham" <hello+emacs <at> miangraham.com>
Cc: 59214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, pankaj <at> codeisgreat.org
Subject: bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 08:19:57 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 8:12 AM M. Ian Graham <hello+emacs <at> miangraham.com>
wrote:

>
> If we're adding a new dependency on an optional installation method, can
> we also please retain the "add rust-analyzer to PATH and eglot will just
> work" current behavior as well?
>

So rustup is just an optional way of installing rust-analyzer? If so I
think we shouldn't
tweak this.

João

(tangent:  rustup being optional is intriguing and interesting. If I wanted
to learn Rust, just Rust, should I start with a rustup-less setup?)

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.