GNU bug report logs - #59214
[PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added

Previous Next

Full log

Message #28 received at 59214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, pankaj <at> codeisgreat.org
Subject: Re: bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:31:39 +0200

> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:14:11 +0000
> Cc: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj <at> codeisgreat.org>, 59214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Here, we would need and rust expert to explain why the the middle entry is different or more useful than the
> first one. I'm not that expert, but Pankaj's rationale looks reasonably sane. So maybe delete the simple
> "rust-analyzer" one? Or maybe not. But two entries for the same server looks odd. As i said, this must be
> looked at by someone with knowledge of rust toolchain and configuration idioms.

For starters, maybe Pankaj could provide more details to answer your
questions?  Perhaps after talking to a Rust expert?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.