From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:40:03 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#59200 <59200@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#59200 <59200@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: ASDF build system/sbcl doesn't build FASLs on some packages Reply-To: bug#59200 <59200@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:40:03 +0000 retitle 59200 ASDF build system/sbcl doesn't build FASLs on some packages reassign 59200 guix submitter 59200 ykonai severity 59200 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 11 14:25:12 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2022 19:25:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otZeJ-0007zP-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:25:12 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43202) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otQDo-00013n-4Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:21:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otQDl-0006ar-Fk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:21:11 -0500 Received: from mail.ykonai.net ([2605:6400:10:1424:8f2:1eb3:b35b:fe2d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1otQDc-0007HU-W9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 04:21:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ykonai.net; s=dkim; t=1668158473; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=cOPjnf8/mjgd7HxKQdD4vpqxY0oToMxWoAmGXkqBxRM=; b=T7HPhkZxsFYaMGg3U3+MP7b2IHoI/Cp21/xBApsR8tXFAY1MWTnpXEJD/LicCJ3dz9EQB1 Ej4vlTFr62HwEi2DuwSvwrA7gqEx8+fckrRy/bTQ4mmMWenkqzJ6UEE1WYvnR0bEKypYpn v1b3efUlmmYvufGPHrECEskTGjxP5uWkT08nlsFzkX61pTolJfw8tcZyJ/ZjvuOfjEvVxR HtxErdrTsprBm2gXM+nsYHnv+VjwrjqxQEH3ong3MqJ8HwBI6rFeyW8zMXea97DOJyXIYX SticCVJa+GCG1+I11nHIXbcWG/vGAHnjg8fgbrG9bK8rI4UtYA7aYWOE5EDNuQ== Received: by mail.ykonai.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3db52f50 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:21:12 +0000 (UTC) From: ykonai To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: ASDF build system/sbcl doesn't build FASLs on some packages Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:20:55 +0100 Message-ID: <8535apzw20.fsf@ykonai.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2605:6400:10:1424:8f2:1eb3:b35b:fe2d; envelope-from=mail@ykonai.net; helo=mail.ykonai.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:25:10 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) guix shell sbcl sbcl-uuid --pure -- sbcl --eval '(require :asdf)' --eval '(asdf:load-system :uuid)' #: Error opening #P"/gnu/store/in6ndcrnqg9pp2glkbvl1s072zp7r34y-sbcl-uuid-2012.12.26-1.e7d6680/lib/common-lisp/sbcl/uuid/uuid-tmpGHU3ALSV.fasl": Read-only file system The issue seems to be that the sbcl-uuid package has an empty lib/common-lisp/sbcl/uuid directory: the FASL files don't get built. The build log shows everything is fine https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1670426/log/raw so I believe this has to be an issue with the asdf-build-system/sbcl itself. It also seems to affect a number of packages, including from what I've seen: sbcl-numcl, sbcl-lack, and sbcl-mito. It doesn't seem to be a missing #:asd-systems argument either (the .asd file is loaded fine per the build log). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 12 04:16:50 2022 Received: (at 59200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2022 09:16:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otmd8-0003Ha-Bq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 04:16:50 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53]:39854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1otmd6-0003HO-QD for 59200@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 04:16:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id x13so4992550qvn.6 for <59200@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 01:16:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XgpQm6vhVB3UWaWOUqn70JQ2Et0D9Xp0+f5hVoHA7Ts=; b=A0P5DTafgB5FlPYe8l5ISLWZ1Xl1EMRz4vK3g8HowE4C5cDSmll8a+xUDjj8+l45VO 9GJmb8IscLyFbljpMSHFhmZUJBFw80/RacbiO4Ds++ZYdFB6RppXGyds629bbrU3eS/7 te7k30+Vfl62nvt8Gk1Erma7GWtGSPqGzqErFeLqSFGDZa252+9c/3nPNKko6buFuSsh rGJ/h63X9v0mM7p86pvYhQ41k7NQmL7tzZDTiMU9UXMiccn+fToP3CiCHo4UmANRd6PB qplKPXpMFMFDdEXHwOK8CklQynItH+e27sNcCuVi3sD1sjpTxXTiVDCQBr+Q5VYFdpZ4 HdOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XgpQm6vhVB3UWaWOUqn70JQ2Et0D9Xp0+f5hVoHA7Ts=; b=ZtLfQR7EujJ17vo6P2KeXiv7Gm70XHdLuweNiDgVIgm1mxczehxQIYr8JFfaAHL4H2 nYzgTGIVDRMl+Ev0gBRJEOeiiKuLjpw3aD3TTz1DVhnxEcOSXQPB/oluT91KOErsKkSK V/sC5that0GbO8Em/xIGliOcqaEB14ehxBl7nFI+TX2vLnZR+OgYC1a1xG0fvEBK627/ hBxvO1i/4iuYG4lLqxoEox6fr3M5RGlQ1v4Ur6E6++sMVIkK2rwqdbs5jnDAKy6ekVqN TD+XvoAq+i+CAv5tgYzBF4ASN90yUXjMGxETKLOCzGGM681U/4VkFmSkSi+0rr85k4ND VfOw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl/9RqKuPEMeOuaPYL9Vy88P/vxIINKgttd9z+yVUonIaEd+r2e 8CJ3e7PmnqJuEjavOaAnnkgwc/tLoJ+ZnJD/1YO5Uy7V X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7y7yyuM2FCijs2/66SghR61+yqbR5/gU4Pardp24TWXfmSBbTppQQ2C60Xab3i2y65pj7sW/zyIlCuju5sm48= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fa0f:0:b0:4b4:7ac1:aa38 with SMTP id q15-20020a0cfa0f000000b004b47ac1aa38mr5236168qvn.84.1668244602984; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 01:16:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sharlatan Hellseher Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:16:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: To: 59200@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f59f3e05ed427637" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, I've got the same issue while packing cl-graph which has cl-containers as one of the inputs. It's fails exactly the same where it can't assess cl-containers FASL file. Regards, Oleg Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (sharlatanus[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.53 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59200 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --000000000000f59f3e05ed427637 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I've got the same issue while packing cl-graph which has cl-containers as one of the inputs. It's fails exactly the same where it can't assess cl-containers FASL file. Regards, Oleg --000000000000f59f3e05ed427637 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I've= got the same issue while packing cl-graph which has cl-containers as one o= f the inputs. It's fails exactly the same where it can't assess cl-= containers FASL file.

Re= gards,
Oleg
--000000000000f59f3e05ed427637-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 15 05:44:03 2022 Received: (at 59200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2022 10:44:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53121 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1outQB-0003in-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 05:44:03 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:49187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1outQ9-0003i9-Da for 59200@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 05:44:02 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F13240103 for <59200@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:43:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668509035; bh=DjHj3OEfUBxU8V1tnE0AplVpE6vChXzwA3JVYeCBLAw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=IsGboEj/RuPVIqfGI5L9ciUJOi0cr9rMQOhvhxTuh1Py+7PEx/MFpOb4f5xfhFxKO tJ1Y/s22CGwbE33/7AUsNSArIaq0FoQhrADqLXsr2bhs3D8nf8XUrGOBWO+pY6kfZR PwFTJuzgay03TS4r33Yrg5IppRVCRGrSLt2dj6P9w46OoRlAiGS/dbplZnYoDUl4aD Db4Y6LChKyXdKna2LzBS7GukjF/LGD+vlBjbgm04aA2NLGLulUkdLXCvvFfRZNCwuL vGWMYvFDJpAjPMB5cgLtOAuaAyLIw2J/Rstum4/XiNR+TP7RKo7ooYvT102kqMATAg /JiE5Sw9VmVTg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NBN8B4j2Pz6tnG for <59200@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:43:53 +0100 (CET) References: <8535apzw20.fsf@ykonai.net> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: 59200@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#59200: ASDF build system/sbcl doesn't build FASLs on some packages Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:32:37 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <878rkczedz.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59200 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi, I can't reproduce this issue. I tried --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix shell sbcl sbcl-uuid --pure -- sbcl --eval '(require :asdf)' --eval '(asdf:load-system :uuid)' guix shell sbcl sbcl-cl-containers --pure -- sbcl --eval '(require :asdf)' --eval '(asdf:load-system :cl-containers)' --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and both commands worked without any error. With each of the following commands, do you see the "uuid.fasl" file at the end or not? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ls -l $(guix build sbcl-uuid)/lib/common-lisp/sbcl/uuid/ ls -l $(guix build --check --no-grafts sbcl-uuid)/lib/common-lisp/sbcl/uuid/ --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCY3NtaA8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/1SAD8DL5FK3e1VfmsR+hQ2pAxdsrle99GvcfR4+cj Sys3q2wA/jsDV7QO3YO59wrbWeZHbcsmNFJlVKFdznf83CxCZ0MN =ceUU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 15 19:14:31 2022 Received: (at 59200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2022 00:14:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ov64T-0006vn-3O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:14:31 -0500 Received: from mail.ykonai.net ([23.183.83.77]:54212) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ov549-0005Ks-9l for 59200@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:10:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ykonai.net; s=dkim; t=1668553814; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=58+qKuKo2U+b63/6ogy+WZ18k2I+lDFoxpFL/uLHdnM=; b=eqVrhiXooQZM592rcU4X5G24D4dsWYiNg+9X7IPyf6bqD9O5t3dVKKXKXbGFc/bp9F2qam AZcLsQUthwtm3o1HNe9uiuOW9oZu7FzUekrPHFKAVUTjp6ytZhjU/47Sa2i/an7Y2M6BPy iH4fX2ldnf52O2zFMk9cCFKWPilWnDuIej5Y4A9mS5+3iASFjsI+/SY15GqzEWiw6iHBv/ UdGn+x9Ps68XuZKEdso/00HZHiYSNVWzeS4dcGQTR69JUeCoidBtY3I6jfns0dPqvulpLD /Y4cDXmnVGqYqNNVH6V10yTepFABAwIJri6W9ttxJG94M5dtGySUDtBXE9N5Tw== Received: by mail.ykonai.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ea586e5d (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <59200@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 23:10:13 +0000 (UTC) From: ykonai To: 59200@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: reproducibility Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:09:55 +0100 Message-ID: <85r0y3n7b0.fsf@ykonai.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59200 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:14:27 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I can definitely consistently reproduce this issue. Maybe something in your filesystem could interfere with this? Try: guix shell sbcl sbcl-uuid --container -- sbcl --eval '(require :asdf)' --eval '(asdf:load-system :uuid)' This is on guix commit 8f9588185d74f1f251b041b84d43302c337588ff, which is from a fresh guix pull. I was wrong wrt. .fasl files missing: ls -l $(guix build sbcl-uuid)/lib/common-lisp/sbcl/uuid/ does show that the FASL is there, it is simply that SBCL arbitrarily decides it needs to be recompiled, which looks like the problem here. It could be some ASDF upstream bug. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 16 05:32:36 2022 Received: (at 59200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2022 10:32:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovFie-0001r1-BV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 05:32:36 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:57079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovFia-0001ql-Cz for 59200@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 05:32:34 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 315B1240106 for <59200@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:32:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668594746; bh=twADnV9JCVxtxm8wFZVGsrgajalh3WZQY5TzflPenkM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=dVy/4E7K0PNbAs3Sw/lyVDPORnQJPvyGJXuQB5P4Jihuhzx5XLKMHh9loA1ab4Rlk 5Yq9fmzLLQx5BBNYh0PDDRfLtly/lPRTlM9ng6iA7bUlObsppVfOjeFFIIQ+uvZMyN 0b/EPFM8xg99V6ZobhPXrfRB+20BtgrqzNRpEVb51nSb86eHHp3dgo66j87SBkYh2l omB9NirbAlpNUdGAzHS/YX1fo/1jBRXgdFZsuCe6W99wh8l3gcO7276LoeADs9OhD2 xO4gC+YPaV1MOUqzv4QS1tvwwKecTqHoxl4wP1E8bWAlasto6US1ZSnyjCi1FQNTFy Q2NHSEz92jjiA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NBzrT2QDjz9rxS; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:32:22 +0100 (CET) References: <8535apzw20.fsf@ykonai.net> <85r0y3n7b0.fsf@ykonai.net> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: ykonai Subject: Re: bug#59200: reproducibility Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:20:20 +0000 In-reply-to: <85r0y3n7b0.fsf@ykonai.net> Message-ID: <87y1sb196x.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59200 Cc: 59200@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ykonai via Bug reports for GNU Guix skribis: > I can definitely consistently reproduce this issue. Maybe something in > your filesystem could interfere with this? Try: > guix shell sbcl sbcl-uuid --container -- sbcl --eval '(require :asdf)' > --eval '(asdf:load-system :uuid)' > > This is on guix commit 8f9588185d74f1f251b041b84d43302c337588ff, which > is from a fresh guix pull. > > I was wrong wrt. .fasl files missing: ls -l $(guix build > sbcl-uuid)/lib/common-lisp/sbcl/uuid/ does show that the FASL is there, > it is simply that SBCL arbitrarily decides it needs to be recompiled, > which looks like the problem here. It could be some ASDF upstream bug. I tried: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix time-machine --commit=8f9588185d74f1f251b041b84d43302c337588ff -- \ shell sbcl sbcl-uuid --container -- \ sbcl --no-userinit --eval '(require :asdf)' --eval '(asdf:load-system :uuid)' --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and it worked without error. Maybe there is something in your local CL configuration (.sbclrc) that ASDF doesn't like... Could you check if you still have an error when ignoring the local configuration with: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix shell sbcl sbcl-uuid --container -- \ sbcl --no-userinit --eval '(require :asdf)' --eval '(asdf:load-system :uuid)' --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCY3S8Ng8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/iJQD/fXEDiHlzHcXfW06cVmvZqft9dbOoh12VM6X/ 73XOb3gA+wWa/txtLqxQrYfuu45Nk8Eor+AcrrRPnMrJ99tGTjk/ =3/FG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 16 07:46:18 2022 Received: (at 59200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2022 12:46:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovHo2-0007a7-57 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 07:46:18 -0500 Received: from mail.ykonai.net ([23.183.83.77]:34230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovHo0-0007Zt-OR for 59200@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 07:46:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ykonai.net; s=dkim; t=1668602786; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PgBDBWkiH9YQ1fhtxkesJ+Du3pGeUWFHUj17SuaxufI=; b=ZY2sbeyE3SXJ7/HaD01AwfazoqaEOoHS3HAbNrw+T/wK6mvixQp8KBpeIihSk80XWk78GJ SCCKazBqwjX5ADiG+sLZ5Pk/p33+CRaTEC/O7CVSbPsV+iUb/hnL38paPAP7yJFdyR6EYA L1T5r7Ew6oritnbni/E7o/etfnHPctewcbjlVgYNjw42x43J17+X2lguCTjg8vxtbC6W9Q mBcAhCKfz8qjY48fEU3EYYrPP5ObYh73bcrVZ9am3/mIneBdRkSDKrzeJr/LecUeEsCUBg v42PWirM6TCnNQdl/Qv4g+4pA6IobLxs60jJg8s+x0ZBJq/GCEHK3TjTLcx8lA== Received: by mail.ykonai.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 842caeaa (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:46:25 +0000 (UTC) From: ykonai To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: bug#59200: reproducibility References: <8535apzw20.fsf@ykonai.net> <85r0y3n7b0.fsf@ykonai.net> <87y1sb196x.fsf@kitej> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:46:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y1sb196x.fsf@kitej> (Guillaume Le Vaillant's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:20:20 +0000") Message-ID: <85mt8rm5in.fsf@ykonai.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59200 Cc: 59200@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, It turns out this was due to the fact that I had ironclad git cloned on my computer, which was accidentally visible via :tree in the ASDF configuration. ASDF detected that a different ironclad was used and tried to compile-file to the gnu/store. I thought it was guix-related since it did occur with both --pure and --container, but I was running it with the default cwd share on. Using --container --no-cwd is the solution to this problem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 16 08:08:49 2022 Received: (at 59200-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2022 13:08:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovI9l-0008Aa-MJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:08:49 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44063) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ovI9g-0008AI-Pb for 59200-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:08:44 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47C7240101 for <59200-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:08:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668604114; bh=jqQW4Bb78zyLBLuHr6oEa3FTy2G4q/+eavPuuLkuyMw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=JY6pbnC3amcJHH8uZK3xBOLn+oaem12CM/LfpxWIHeOB8n4jylfG/IoNCOyYfbaRA wqPV1SYI7n01YVwKD5tUL4ViWYsgecis8M6ENcEnFcCNf3PMgd/v5bverC5KAHNBUC Jo9qW2CpkxIgGH7+ot8ea8b4ChgwgjmacmlCKfLTBegbDz8IBAf7BZyrVToLUfkkUQ K01eV0OkXKT4tyQTd3xjnnwL1S0ZuMQk6KBYQC4ooQGJ4//Ppqtu1US6DeeC7WSSJ2 eC7DHu/q7Cs2INaKdyPBQ2JnVpQVaUm1TF58EfEkZP8u/Nqgjw+gEdtVUrL28ISf6u 9hjNeKCyTGRCw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NC3Jf15N1z6tpQ; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:08:33 +0100 (CET) References: <8535apzw20.fsf@ykonai.net> <85r0y3n7b0.fsf@ykonai.net> <87y1sb196x.fsf@kitej> <85mt8rm5in.fsf@ykonai.net> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: ykonai Subject: Re: bug#59200: reproducibility Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:05:29 +0000 In-reply-to: <85mt8rm5in.fsf@ykonai.net> Message-ID: <87tu2z11ym.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59200-close Cc: 59200-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ykonai skribis: > Hi, > > It turns out this was due to the fact that I had ironclad git cloned on > my computer, which was accidentally visible via :tree in the ASDF > configuration. ASDF detected that a different ironclad was used and > tried to compile-file to the gnu/store. I thought it was guix-related > since it did occur with both --pure and --container, but I was running > it with the default cwd share on. > > Using --container --no-cwd is the solution to this problem.=20 Ok. Closing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCY3Tg0Q8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j8aFwD+M/+aJxDnUQBNqwVmcRH4OORLFWLlsJ+YezUM 22GGd6wA/3HIi8uP3vLw6dOG4iXaB9UNVO5QVsxm12nkMAFoDVSq =d96R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:40:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator