GNU bug report logs - #59094
29.0.50; ediff-revision flags wrong lines in etc/HELLO

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mike Kupfer <mkupfer <at> alum.berkeley.edu>

Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 05:30:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Mike Kupfer <mkupfer <at> alum.berkeley.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Mike Kupfer <mkupfer <at> alum.berkeley.edu>
Cc: 59094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59094: 29.0.50; ediff-revision flags wrong lines in etc/HELLO
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 18:49:22 +0200
> From: Mike Kupfer <mkupfer <at> alum.berkeley.edu>
> cc: 59094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 07:49:36 -0800
> 
> Are the charset tags (annotations) really necessary, given the setting
> of 'coding' in the local variables?

Yes, they help Emacs choose suitable fonts where the same characters
should use different fonts depending on the character set.

> The reason I ask is that the files that I saved last night from the old
> and new Ediff buffers can be reloaded, and Ediff is able to correctly
> show the changes.  Yet I don't see any visual distinctions between the
> new file and etc/HELLO, even though the new file's mode is just
> Fundamental, not Fundamental Enriched.  (Even the orange text on lines 1
> and 34 is duplicated in the saved file, which I confess puzzles me.)

The effect of the charsets is really relevant to CJK cultures, and
even that is nowadays less important than 20 years ago.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 282 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.