GNU bug report logs - #59087
29.0.50; package-vc-update error

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Feng Shu <tumashu <at> 163.com>

Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 02:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #56 received at 59087 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com>
Cc: Feng Shu <tumashu <at> 163.com>, 59087 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59087: 29.0.50; package-vc-update error
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:29:51 +0000
Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Do you think we should make it such?  The command is strictly speaking
>> not necessary, because package-update does the same thing.
>
> Does it?  `package-update' updates *all* packages, not just the VC
> packages.  If I understand that correctly, then I suggest we auto-load
> `package-vc-update[-all]' so that the user can update *just* their VC
> package[s] when they need to.

Just to avoid, confusion, we have two separate issues here: What
packages are prompted for updating, what packages a command can update.
package-vc-update prompts only VC packages, package-update prompts all
packages, always including VC packages.  But both commands always just
update a single package.

In fact, what package-update does is just check if a package is a VC
package, in which case it just calls package-vc-update.  I am actually
leaning towards removing package-vc-update, but I recognise the
convenience of package-vc-update-all and think preserving the symmetry
is preferable.

> Rudy




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 216 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.