From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 03 15:57:13 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2022 19:57:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50821 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oqgKv-0005mO-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:57:13 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oqgKp-0005mD-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:57:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqgKp-0000X2-IK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:57:07 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqgKl-00016j-UY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:57:07 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id x18so1885237qki.4 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zUd5ZaxmON6anEWy3VfV5Gov0ZYpnWdoDDC5Ishlms4=; b=dVOm2fP2rKZ/X0MLSBk/tHD8xfroAvcb7TAqOPtz2P0JIyCYt6129qKfK21scD+4tR gmbnbTSWlwoNw2OC2mMm7kIyrycOMGxlBsjML3UVquiUJ1H+j9ubiald5P45gXRfgBFd hW+maNJUDdOAa7CdU0DwppTt3Yv7cZb4Au3mtZp7V5A/7SWTweERT8NM0UVF2OmCDU1Y Dx66uAe3IyB+MknydJfQN/mA6LgffUve+XJGwub1OQlgf7DRE1YHtVHmwp2pDZbuoDhM ggiGC0gnJcWBcRLN+qeVpQBix7KdUWJTSEO/1S5UHHtIm0GsXDrhCQg0Q6stqUiZuilC Qhqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zUd5ZaxmON6anEWy3VfV5Gov0ZYpnWdoDDC5Ishlms4=; b=7D5ybY58t7aV+o7TIzZa9KIXPMzVlsCCBicbYiPgp4GXmrQe/Qf55SPQ3FWw5o9mVG L5MDsLf6Vyk7pwMv+f16dV8xtesnp2ii/bf9EGUUju29bELTR/Ymbato8IQ+Uc9GTe0o e+G2uSJY/DTCu1IFyvfdC6/Qru9VS7vv34tnk96hHJOEG8tm5JE5NK1K3VWZE1yH4G04 srFcHTKcgfmmURsaLzLCgxZAtuea8w+Qyq7Y4D6sQ/AMK1DazEu/ZEcCRG3PE4HDWCov kWyMWWAI91YszeeFddpfofwLcgzLREZkEaH29Yj+xnQXuLT/dasameNuvMCVcY0TlmvY q9ng== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf31nvkR2kQ/znILcIn4V8qwYECpgk/06FYgbGkUi6D5G78LQCkX 8ODRNR/WsnA6eQz1KYPN+dWJFXHXUsQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM66Ww19kBrHOgV40SZLf8Rl364XH0GhyC7Q6bx8L2WdUybiyud9xFyf1NSLXHpzVaT+cl5Qzg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:22c3:b0:6ec:53bb:d296 with SMTP id o3-20020a05620a22c300b006ec53bbd296mr23487129qki.158.1667505422381; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-159-188.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.159.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10-20020a05620a408a00b006fa63cc7affsm1372934qko.34.2022.11.03.12.57.01 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:57:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guix Subject: hyperledger-iroha is broken Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:57:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87fsezak1e.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::729; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x729.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, I've tried fixing hyperledger-iroha without success. Updating it to latest would require prometheus-cpp, not yet packaged. Anything I've tried always end up with C++ compilation errors, such as this one (protobuf 3.14): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- c++14 -Wall -fdiagnostics-color=3Dalways -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -fPIC -MD -MT shar= ed_model/backend/protobuf/CMakeFiles/shared_model_proto_backend.dir/queries= /impl/proto_get_signatories.o -MF CMakeFiles/shared_model_proto_backend.dir= /queries/impl/proto_get_signatories.o.d -o CMakeFiles/shared_model_proto_ba= ckend.dir/queries/impl/proto_get_signatories.o -c /tmp/guix-build-hyperledg= er-iroha-1.1.1.drv-0/source/shared_model/backend/protobuf/queries/impl/prot= o_get_signatories.cpp /tmp/guix-build-hyperledger-iroha-1.1.1.drv-0/source/irohad/consensus/yac/i= mpl/peer_orderer_impl.cpp: In member function =E2=80=98virtual boost::optio= nal iroha::consensus::yac::PeerOrde= rerImpl::getOrdering(const iroha::consensus::yac::YacHash&, std::vector >)=E2=80=99: /tmp/guix-build-hyperledger-iroha-1.1.1.drv-0/source/irohad/consensus/yac/i= mpl/peer_orderer_impl.cpp:28:14: error: =E2=80=98shuffle=E2=80=99 is not a = member of =E2=80=98std=E2=80=99 28 | std::shuffle(peers.begin(), peers.end(), gen); | ^~~~~~~ make[2]: *** [irohad/consensus/yac/CMakeFiles/yac.dir/build.make:121: iroha= d/consensus/yac/CMakeFiles/yac.dir/impl/peer_orderer_impl.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --=20 Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 04 07:05:59 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2022 11:05:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oquWN-0006hj-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:05:59 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oquWL-0006hd-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:05:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oquWL-000589-BZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:05:57 -0400 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oquWG-00034h-Ja for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:05:57 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N3d8T6Tmsz9s86; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:05:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1667559945; bh=2Wr252VxDYrbj+wM4jfUPsSLNFZqf4W9MsDZggLskOQ=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=iRpwMxC0Mx1dlfktqxx/fyru4K7BaDo+v31lJlpc/7GZWcqzZreyrX4Epf2Sx/Syz IOH6hI4i09BiPj/axkzereggJP0u57wJOQvLVCoVSzgqG9FZhmKarpJDylvnUPM2ih skgQDAwO/u0J44lG7Rrb6BJBhfK6ebWpMIeH9vsg= X-Riseup-User-ID: 053A89F4582B388C1F7FE91C8CB4DBEFCFAAEA5CE09B71641B0105A02FCDA600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4N3d8T1PKgz5vRh; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:05:44 +0000 (UTC) References: <87fsezak1e.fsf@gmail.com> From: Csepp To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#59004: hyperledger-iroha is broken Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 12:01:26 +0100 In-reply-to: <87fsezak1e.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87fsezc73v.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.6; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx0.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 59004@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hi, > > I've tried fixing hyperledger-iroha without success. Updating it to > latest would require prometheus-cpp, not yet packaged. Anything I've > tried always end up with C++ compilation errors, such as this one > (protobuf 3.14): > > c++14 -Wall -fdiagnostics-color=3Dalways -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -fPIC -MD -MT sh= ared_model/backend/protobuf/CMakeFiles/shared_model_proto_backend.dir/queri= es/impl/proto_get_signatories.o -MF CMakeFiles/shared_model_proto_backend.d= ir/queries/impl/proto_get_signatories.o.d -o CMakeFiles/shared_model_proto_= backend.dir/queries/impl/proto_get_signatories.o -c /tmp/guix-build-hyperle= dger-iroha-1.1.1.drv-0/source/shared_model/backend/protobuf/queries/impl/pr= oto_get_signatories.cpp > /tmp/guix-build-hyperledger-iroha-1.1.1.drv-0/source/irohad/consensus/yac= /impl/peer_orderer_impl.cpp: In member function =E2=80=98virtual boost::opt= ional iroha::consensus::yac::PeerOr= dererImpl::getOrdering(const iroha::consensus::yac::YacHash&, std::vector >)=E2=80=99: > /tmp/guix-build-hyperledger-iroha-1.1.1.drv-0/source/irohad/consensus/yac= /impl/peer_orderer_impl.cpp:28:14: error: =E2=80=98shuffle=E2=80=99 is not = a member of =E2=80=98std=E2=80=99 > 28 | std::shuffle(peers.begin(), peers.end(), gen); > | ^~~~~~~ > make[2]: *** [irohad/consensus/yac/CMakeFiles/yac.dir/build.make:121: iro= had/consensus/yac/CMakeFiles/yac.dir/impl/peer_orderer_impl.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... At first I thought it might be using a C++ standard that is too new or too old, but std::shuffle seems to have been standardized in C++11 and has not been removed since. Hmm. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/random_shuffle Still, I'd try compiling again with different compiler flags, might have some luck. Or looking into how std::shuffle is defined in the standard lib= rary.