GNU bug report logs - #58960
29.0.50; Assert fails when browsing an URL

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 04:49:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 58960 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, tino.calancha <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#58960: 29.0.50; Assert fails when browsing an URL, bug#58960: 29.0.50; Assert fails when browsing an URL
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:58:23 +0100
>>>>> On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 15:10:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    >> Cc: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>,
    >> 58960 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
    >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
    >> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 11:20:31 +0100
    >> 
    >> Looks like `call-process' needs to ensure the child signal fdʼs are
    >> set up before calling `emacs_spawn'.

    Eli> Why do we need this?  IOW, do you understand how did SIGCHLD cause
    Eli> this?

`browse-url' does `call-process' for `xdg-open' by default. `xdg-open'
exits almost immediately, we get SIGCHLD:

(gdb) bt
#0  terminate_due_to_signal (sig=6, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:421
#1  0x00005555555b489e in die
    (msg=msg <at> entry=0x5555558d938f "0 <= fd", file=file <at> entry=0x5555558d9354 "process.c", line=line <at> entry=7386) at alloc.c:7692
#2  0x00005555555bfec9 in child_signal_notify () at process.c:7386
#3  handle_child_signal (sig=<optimized out>) at process.c:7493
#4  0x000055555574e992 in deliver_process_signal
    (sig=17, handler=0x555555831b40 <handle_child_signal>) at sysdep.c:1741
#5  0x00007ffff5752140 in <signal handler called> ()

`child_signal_notify' does this:

  int fd = child_signal_write_fd;
  eassert (0 <= fd);

and if `child_signal_init' hasnʼt been called, then this is still
true:

/* The write end thereof.  The SIGCHLD handler writes to this file
   descriptor to notify `wait_reading_process_output' of process
   status changes.  */
static int child_signal_write_fd = -1;

so the assert fails.

Why canʼt we just call `child_signal_init' from `init_process_emacs'
instead of `create_process'?

Robert
-- 




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 204 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.