GNU bug report logs - #58903
[PATCH] gnu: nix: Update to 2.11.1.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: phodina <phodina <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 20:46:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: phodina <phodina <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: "58903 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <58903 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "go.wigust <at> gmail.com" <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>, "i <at> pengmeiyu.com" <i <at> pengmeiyu.com>
Subject: [bug#58903] Specify the build dir for Nix
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:45:30 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Heyo,

phodina 写道:
> The issue is that there are some packages that fail to build 
> even on realtively powerful machine due to resource exhaustion - 
> not enough
> RAM.

Yes, this is an issue in Guix as well, e.g., when building disc 
images.

> Unfortunately I'm not aware of any other way how to specify I'd 
> like to build just this package in other directory (other than 
> `/tmp`).
>
> Also is there some other way how Guix handles this issue? I 
> might be also used in Nix.

No, Guix uses the exact same mechanism (and possibly code), 
inherited directly from Nix.

>  (build-dir           nix-configuration-build-dir ;string
>                       (default "/tmp"))

‘directory’.  Plz, no unnec. abbrev.

The concept LGTM.  Calling it a ‘build directory’ might be 
editorialising too much.  Does Nix use it for anything else?

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 197 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.