GNU bug report logs -
#58856
Non-free license CC-BY-ND on GNU ELPA web pages
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 58856 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 58856 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, rms <at> gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58856
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 29 Oct 2022 04:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, rms <at> gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 29 Oct 2022 04:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On the GNU ELPA/NonGNU ELPA web pages, we are currently using the
Creative Commons Noderivatives 4.0 license. This license is in the
footer on all HTML pages on elpa.gnu.org and elpa.nongnu.org, for
example here:
https://elpa.gnu.org/
However, this license is non-free according to the FSF.[1]
How about changing these web pages to the free (and copyleft),
Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 license instead? [2]
Footnotes:
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC-BY-ND
[2] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ccbysa
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58856
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 58856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> On the GNU ELPA/NonGNU ELPA web pages, we are currently using the
> Creative Commons Noderivatives 4.0 license. This license is in the
> footer on all HTML pages on elpa.gnu.org and elpa.nongnu.org, for
> example here:
> https://elpa.gnu.org/
> However, this license is non-free according to the FSF.[1]
Whether that is a problem depends on what sort of material is in those
pages.
In the GNU Project we use CC-BY-ND for publications that
state our views. Most articles on www.gnu.org carry CC-BY-ND.
However, for documentation of software, we use free licenses.
Which of those categories do these pages fall in? (Or are theh in
neither one?) That is the crucial question here. If these pages are
software documentation -- that includes brief descriptions of packages
-- then it should have a free license.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58856
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 31 Oct 2022 14:16:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 58856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org> writes:
> In the GNU Project we use CC-BY-ND for publications that
> state our views. Most articles on www.gnu.org carry CC-BY-ND.
>
> However, for documentation of software, we use free licenses.
>
> Which of those categories do these pages fall in? (Or are theh in
> neither one?) That is the crucial question here. If these pages are
> software documentation -- that includes brief descriptions of packages
> -- then it should have a free license.
It is software documentation, yes. Thanks for confirming. So I
installed the below change in the elpa-admin repository.
Stefan M, could you please update the static web pages too?
diff --git a/elpa-admin.el b/elpa-admin.el
index f8f8fcabb6..c804612516 100644
--- a/elpa-admin.el
+++ b/elpa-admin.el
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ readme file has an unconventional name"
<p>Design provided by <a
href=\"https://nicolas.petton.fr\">Nicolas Petton</a></p>
<p>
This website is licensed under the
- <a
href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/\">CC BY-ND
4.0</a>
+ <a
href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/\">CC BY-SA
4.0</a>
International License.
</p>
<p><a href=\"/jslicense.html\"
data-jslicense=\"1\">JavaScript Licenses</a></p>
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58856
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:50:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 58856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Which of those categories do these pages fall in? (Or are theh in
> > neither one?) That is the crucial question here. If these pages are
> > software documentation -- that includes brief descriptions of packages
> > -- then it should have a free license.
> It is software documentation, yes. Thanks for confirming. So I
> installed the below change in the elpa-admin repository.
Thanks for bringing it up.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58856
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 12 Nov 2022 20:46:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 58856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Stefan M, could you please update the static web pages too?
Just a ping, in case you missed this. Should be a quick fix.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58856
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 12 Nov 2022 22:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 58856 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas [2022-11-12 12:45:55] wrote:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> Stefan M, could you please update the static web pages too?
> Just a ping, in case you missed this. Should be a quick fix.
Done, thanks,
Stefan
Reply sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 13 Nov 2022 04:02:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 13 Nov 2022 04:02:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 58856-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Stefan Kangas [2022-11-12 12:45:55] wrote:
>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>> Stefan M, could you please update the static web pages too?
>> Just a ping, in case you missed this. Should be a quick fix.
>
> Done, thanks,
Thanks, bug closed.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:24:09 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 187 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.