GNU bug report logs - #58813
can't substitute etc/teams.scm command as doc suggests

Previous Next

Full log

Message #59 received at 58813 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Maxim Cournoyer
 <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 58813 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Document how to use Patman for patches submission.
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 18:26:09 +0100

Am Freitag, dem 03.03.2023 um 10:54 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hi,
> 
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> 
> > Fixes <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58813>.
> 
> It’s only tangentially related, no?
> 
> > * doc/contributing.texi (Sending a Patch Series): Mention Patman. 
> > Adjust the examples to no longer showcase broken command
> > substitutions.  Add a section about how to use Patman, with
> > examples.
> 
> I’m not convinced we’d want to advocate for yet another tool.  I feel
> like this would make patch submission guidelines even more complex,
> or at least look more complex.
I do think it'd be fine to have more options (in a "use what you find
convenient" way), but as-is this patch replaces one imperfect tool with
one where:

> [H]ow many of the ~40 committers would be able to provide guidance
> with patman?  
I'm not one of them :(

> That shouldn’t be the only criterion, but it certainly is an
> important one.
I think an important criterion should be what aspiring committers can
expect when they follow the advice as written.  Compare and contrast
'guix style', where committers often have to point out its flaws.

Cheers

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.