GNU bug report logs - #58561
Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: mail <at> brendan.scot

Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 03:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: mail <at> brendan.scot
Subject: bug#58561: closed (Source hash mismatch with aggregator +
 possible guix bug with hashes.)
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 01:57:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 58561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
58561: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58561
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>
To: 58561-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 01:56:23 +0000
Issue was fixed and Tobias explained the hash issue.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:42:14 +1100
I'm getting this after the recent updates:

sha256 hash mismatch for 
/gnu/store/iv6ixlrvh0swq22fjal0cbfbr9ayaq7m-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz:
  expected hash: 1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8
  actual hash: 08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g


However what concerned me more is that when I look in the source code it 
looks like this:

(sha256
        (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8"))


Notice how at the start its a '9', not a '1'?

I've tried with both guix pull local repo and building from source.


Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 102 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.