GNU bug report logs - #58561
Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #32 received at 58561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: phodina <phodina <at> protonmail.com>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 58561 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, mail <at> brendan.scot, Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix
 bug with hashes.
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:29:07 +0000

Hi Simon,

> Indeed, commit 6971feca53a19d60fdd2b39fb2a8966ccf1d6598 pushed on
> core-updates reads,
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> 
> (define-public akregator
> (package
> (name "akregator")
> - (version "21.12.3")
> + (version "22.04.3")
> (source
> (origin
> (method url-fetch)
> (uri (string-append "mirror://kde/stable/release-service/" version
> "/src/akregator-" version ".tar.xz"))
> (sha256
> - (base32 "1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8"))))
> + (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8"))))
> (build-system qt-build-system)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> > Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes?
> 
> 
> Is it a mistake here? A human-typo replacing ’1’ by ’9’? Or
> something else? Petr?

It's just typo. I used mostly guix refresh for large part of the packages. Guess I updated this one manually or somehow cast wrong incantation in Vim.

Sorry for my mistake. I tried to check most of the changes I made in the patch series but this one slipped through in the many rounds of rebuilding Qt and KDE.


----
Petr

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.