From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 15 23:42:32 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2022 03:42:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojuXn-0002Hu-MV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 23:42:31 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojuXl-0002Hl-4k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 23:42:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojuXj-0003dR-Hg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 23:42:27 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::201]:56710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojuXh-0001cW-JY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 23:42:27 -0400 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MqmCc5B1Rz9sQY for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 05:42:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1665891740; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qRnF5xahMaDYhU12+Qd3Tpe/QWVaBLK93LUBOeBqDrs=; b=qcqLGZjqlkJjLNOy1Bs41OXmkA5XnbdW6a711S/3mnBJB2UW2xIeemx662irIKAumK4oul 4PJiHhPQZaLWDJnt6DaRWNhYmRIL+voiyQRwmomTgzXwTkDMg5aEuIxuVLRG6TcKDMQWJ7 +mhKfmZVEPJdiVLsI9Xgx95wbz+A1p9eW6JbbRE/3c4x9P3tTYRka2N8h/IZC4hJ4a6rXu ijEgnFQqRWNt0MKJgyWEbsW6/6foXPK0UEgEisKZpyGewtPotNGbbnijuZQ/penZVcXAFl 4F+qxNGV4dj/mIJSWkNiKfMrJ0neyc79o1th0zEP7pqJ7Shll1hME1PSsEO4Lw== Message-ID: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 14:42:14 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: bug-guix@gnu.org From: Brendan Tildesley Subject: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MqmCc5B1Rz9sQY Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::201; envelope-from=mail@brendan.scot; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: mail@brendan.scot Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I'm getting this after the recent updates: sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/iv6ixlrvh0swq22fjal0cbfbr9ayaq7m-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz:   expected hash: 1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8   actual hash: 08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g However what concerned me more is that when I look in the source code it looks like this: (sha256         (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")) Notice how at the start its a '9', not a '1'? I've tried with both guix pull local repo and building from source. Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 16 00:13:43 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2022 04:13:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojv1z-0003I0-Gf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 00:13:43 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:59130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojv1t-0003HF-9m for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 00:13:42 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MqmvY4gh6z9sR6; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:13:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1665893609; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ny6hFBIv1szUHQv47aeU9BueSsecARIohinZMt4CokM=; b=hR1ErcrX29181WDO9lHjXY8YFpFqEYfJswuDLyTh1CX1n3EtBO1XLZQDPEZERhxcrxfXph fbi4PHu9Ie5vgYTo7lg0G9g7jerWaLywRhxC0q2zseVgsyMlbyj6jDk0wW1BUk8C+Q5oPw V3CAeOarBomGWtx0UoZJpsMJcIzoS513/WJHedvTL3X9UjwSnl25HOwnZ3GJlyH/bNu98m HYM9qNya8/XnYb64arW+DEe3fFFMQmtGAaXIjcLaByJuJBc/gOykm19wD6UrND2BL2nV38 f3c6JTQ5ANrUnj5P0q52HasorMLU3gwGhwsiFkvC84TcfQlOlBodggIJt5mfTw== From: 'Brendan Tildesley To: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: akregator: Correct source hash. Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 15:13:01 +1100 Message-Id: <20221016041301.2055-1-mail@brendan.scot> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: phodina , Brendan Tildesley X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) From: Brendan Tildesley * gnu/packages/kde.scm (akregator): Use correct hash. --- gnu/packages/kde.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde.scm b/gnu/packages/kde.scm index 1d4321237a..37125b1d0b 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/kde.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/kde.scm @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ (define-public akregator (uri (string-append "mirror://kde/stable/release-service/" version "/src/akregator-" version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 - (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")))) + (base32 "08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g")))) (build-system qt-build-system) (arguments `(#:phases -- 2.37.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 16 00:33:38 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2022 04:33:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43048 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojvLF-00069x-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 00:33:37 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:43028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojvLD-00069i-OK for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 00:33:36 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MqnLZ6N14z9sRJ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:33:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1665894807; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hMJY9FtHPQ5UdG0KfJyXPEFWQO263q11cAPrOe/eX9I=; b=xCxHGN/RHrWx4IO+mORntZOp/ckHzxzp++gOxcLkzB0gb0s4sfnaY+OY9CR1m87X1tTPtD 9NzD94i2UKid11aOhBtjcKNsRwud0jahWNPAOjCzgds12hrJFtWymcQFJ+hZ8plX9Kh+YQ PWArz2Hl4udahRVtZk21irJVheTNESL3ZOR3ABDhVBE0KpXpkIvqKr51brX1NSFpPSKfJs FMnDR2gvcxlnKV/xsfLnK5gYgaew0QZ9H378kxcQpDmbnSzdDq4hMGX5r92iGYtYO3Nqtg w/INGCTyVRo6NaZqoiePicVzz51vqmQx0X2PqlIc4bK6bZ2fa0SpSjpBkeothg== From: 'Brendan Tildesley To: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: akregator: Fix build. Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 15:33:21 +1100 Message-Id: <20221016043321.23138-1-mail@brendan.scot> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: phodina , Brendan Tildesley X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) From: Brendan Tildesley * gnu/packages/kde.scm (akregator)[phases]: Fix finding QtWebEngineProcess path. --- gnu/packages/kde.scm | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde.scm b/gnu/packages/kde.scm index 37125b1d0b..d0ffb28505 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/kde.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/kde.scm @@ -167,9 +167,8 @@ (define-public akregator (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) (bin (string-append out "/bin/akregator")) - (qt-process-path (string-append - (assoc-ref inputs "qtwebengine-5") - "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) + (qt-process-path (search-input-file + inputs "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) (wrap-program bin `("QTWEBENGINEPROCESS_PATH" = (,qt-process-path))))))))) (native-inputs -- 2.37.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 16 01:39:38 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2022 05:39:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojwN8-0008N0-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 01:39:38 -0400 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:11823) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojwN3-0008Me-7t for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 01:39:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 05:39:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1665898766; x=1666157966; bh=IUNCkbBbvoMZ82LmykEJbw3DW+CiNV1lEiFWZSESw3E=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=Hs5j6nPpW37Qs3NWY3iGMBBqlXvUOyOoxCzC1oNQ67PVLU6Nyx4BQ/vdeKmLHmF0+ Df2JMHbnHOZttbI2/nKfvmyE0M8DmY+dEJ+zUH1GxFj9Qi3YKdeN4MinSTnHAmDHEJ QMFb5caFQcHh6yGFH4oNfFRxy44v/QSxurE0UKf+q25Tzs/VdlBMW8ND6VcbyY6tIS cnKus5rpy2rJjP9TOLsTPx4G/5cimSBQSU6jPpkV8C2v/Tyu0Lxz1QSUrbyU0vkjYs 0qBwQehWr4SpdAnch0bObnbMFbdWFM2eto9/2FeKJDuLCJRJok/YLiRLe4GRAIT0MF PYmPH5NcNUKRw== To: 'Brendan Tildesley From: phodina Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: akregator: Fix build. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20221016043321.23138-1-mail@brendan.scot> References: <20221016043321.23138-1-mail@brendan.scot> Feedback-ID: 14143818:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, unfortunately incorrect hash was pushed in the last patchset. The patch is already part of the next patch series [1]. Also it's tracked here [2]. 1 https://github.com/phodina/guix/commit/4636279dfb3b96eb5836baad0d8ea36e58= ff79ee 2 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57608#8 ---- Petr Sent with Proton Mail secure email. ------- Original Message ------- On Sunday, October 16th, 2022 at 6:33 AM, 'Brendan Tildesley wrote: > From: Brendan Tildesley mail@brendan.scot >=20 >=20 > * gnu/packages/kde.scm (akregator)[phases]: Fix finding > QtWebEngineProcess path. > --- > gnu/packages/kde.scm | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde.scm b/gnu/packages/kde.scm > index 37125b1d0b..d0ffb28505 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/kde.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/kde.scm > @@ -167,9 +167,8 @@ (define-public akregator > (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) > (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) > (bin (string-append out "/bin/akregator")) > - (qt-process-path (string-append > - (assoc-ref inputs "qtwebengine-5") > - "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) > + (qt-process-path (search-input-file > + inputs "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) > (wrap-program bin > `("QTWEBENGINEPROCESS_PATH" =3D (,qt-process-path))))))))) > (native-inputs > -- > 2.37.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 16 06:05:01 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2022 10:05:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ok0Vw-0003y2-TD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:05:01 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ok0Vs-0003xs-Uz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:04:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok0Vs-0003im-OI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:04:56 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:58708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok0Vq-0002vw-Nx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:04:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=DthG5qdmTbwtY w1pi/0VLG48J7kEwWXYXqTKfPPztgU=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=OPNOPJRV2wxON/aMjp6Dnh2eo/QphPuP0szPBr wISn5MoM8DnastvTcKajFsk8W3tSE7efKTOJaWifjPaZsgLbcR72Q3pY6UAbCk8hIiaGGK IL3hsPmp0Up+keCyZRDWhZCmk8Mme++nipkr5DZpK6ZD5emd3/gMpHNzboIVa5mzz9qXQa sgKi6uNQ2VPg/wDfm76G+6S5YFmjvrPYROT/e6c7eM8hQHothhIt4YdbcvtFRDET7/m49r 0aRFBWwzzOBeLzgErG3FZDTlL+GmsBnyU3ne0OFWbqxE1EuqSkA9YzFP7bo3POahB/7X40 R3dyJPh5wgtl/jYeiiltJAWA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e77b18a0 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 10:04:42 +0000 (UTC) References: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: mail@brendan.scot Subject: Re: bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes. Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:45:00 +0200 In-reply-to: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87y1tgulqk.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 58561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Brendan, Oh! This is a fun one! Brendan Tildesley =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > However what concerned me more is that when I look in the source=20 > code > it looks like this: > > (sha256 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (base32=20 > "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")) > > > Notice how at the start its a '9', not a '1'? [=E2=80=A6] > Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes? It's=E2=80=A6 not a bug. It's the opposite, kind of, although maybe=20 (probably) Guix could (should) reject clearly bogus input like=20 this. What's happening is this: In what can be described only as a bizarre coincidence, sha256=20 produces hashes that are 256 bits long. Base32=C2=B9 encodes 5 bits per character. Our =E2=80=98hash=E2=80=99 stri= ngs are=20 currently 52 characters long, meaning they encode 260 bits. If you poke around Guix, you'll notice that every valid base32=20 =E2=80=98sha256=E2=80=99 hash starts with a 0 or a 1, because those 4 leftm= ost=20 bits are never used, and hence set to zero. In the case of this "9=E2=80=A6" =E2=80=98hash=E2=80=99 (which was random d= ata, I guess?),=20 Guix still reads only 256 bits of the 260, and ignores those 4=20 =E2=80=98extra=E2=80=99 leftmost bits. When it later prints the hash, it converts those 256 bits back to=20 base32, now padded with zeroes, and you see a =E2=80=98hash=E2=80=99 starti= ng with=20 1. What Guix could do is refuse to continue when it detects set=20 higher bits, as they always indicate programmer error. Kind regards, T G-R 1: Guix uses =E2=80=98nix-base32=E2=80=99 which uses a slightly different a= lphabet=20 from the more common base32 variant, but is otherwise identical in=20 operation. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCY0vXcw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15c10BAO5xfaxF596dkXKYFwiyK69C6UJNNSt5BU7cQSkY E7T8AQCRXN+NGyaaE5UuIrJsVusUp22uf0rny4EtIYp8Kpx7Cw== =A3ki -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 17 05:31:02 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 09:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okMSc-0008CE-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:31:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:45009) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okMSa-0008BV-EI for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:31:00 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id bg9-20020a05600c3c8900b003bf249616b0so9532729wmb.3 for <58561@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ID8Yk9BR/zwd0N5EohjFm8tPCDhtUrcRdt5kUlQXSQw=; b=FSsgC6M0VHc1XkGgfdav80TzNbOc0VG5efG06WksJiLpADYUoUqQwByCWVQ5ISrcJd f08Tfdg8Pt6/knXJZve5/0SoDEi3WS3Vp9+4pJhYIPyyxffGPapted7IJlKTCJAOMS8s f5vi/xSiXnimAND4KTyHuB7q4Z2KTatKbEA7m4GcFE+hx76g/i1xUo+d1A2C0oxCPq2A 7bGKjln1jHyoakRE5CsSOpd7j6+FZFDJcS9XJTG3CxLL9r09HghXgi+sF8GeFBaNe/oe HA7t0W4wYfea7Fn9LUWLuy0KPXntWEohLUi2/B2W8j6VBtM0duVVuqYAUGK750BGTPRk sfvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ID8Yk9BR/zwd0N5EohjFm8tPCDhtUrcRdt5kUlQXSQw=; b=2G/I0KF/lIvOvqQ3YIUhtqJ9TdYeh0xINWrpQamy+YU91tZ9Jo7FWSc8bugXU4nIvB gL9qqQYifRfhWmRMQaTjNt62abTEvvxoRfNqWmSTBCharh1XHwGPWV6w7WLVf4t1vJwh A/mDqzaPauh1eedR32LgIhAkzUko+sLWLrXEuMhxrfbaMi6xzJSaHAg3pSl/5QZSZdhq YGfBqsi+LjYo86Sq8oPUA47LMANQ3Jxzv0dlFu8DkoF4hPb2wRNrir6aSijFwxDLYFpe NXkzTUDfzmQzCyOXpHF2MMHIC8BwdHiEVBmq2/QioIzkHG9Pb4qcMZ5f9BLnfBsxUCg8 wiUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1x6wQxe2YLSuhl6wCJPTVKIHpFLRvS2FT+E0AmR6KcVr0cAevq QQ4ZpQ2ALm7+TUrghEyWf2Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4AeaWivegEEua3DkyVOlc+dngoTAjCavmMaQ9A7sC+bHmr5p6UreoQY9AwymGSpWO6ZJnXnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1989:b0:3c6:fabb:ea73 with SMTP id t9-20020a05600c198900b003c6fabbea73mr1150653wmq.19.1665999054611; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8-20020a5d4308000000b0022cdb687bf9sm9825496wrq.0.2022.10.17.02.30.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:30:54 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: mail@brendan.scot, 58561@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes. In-Reply-To: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> References: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1ten8jy.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: phodina , Marius Bakke X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I am also confused. On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 14:42, Brendan Tildesley wrote: > sha256 hash mismatch for=20 > /gnu/store/iv6ixlrvh0swq22fjal0cbfbr9ayaq7m-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz: > =C2=A0 expected hash: 1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8= f8 > =C2=A0 actual hash: 08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g > > > However what concerned me more is that when I look in the source code it= =20 > looks like this: > > (sha256 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmd= vjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")) > > Notice how at the start its a '9', not a '1'? Indeed, commit 6971feca53a19d60fdd2b39fb2a8966ccf1d6598 pushed on core-updates reads, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (define-public akregator (package (name "akregator") - (version "21.12.3") + (version "22.04.3") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://kde/stable/release-service/" version "/src/akregator-" version ".tar.xz")) (sha256 - (base32 "1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")))) + (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")))) (build-system qt-build-system) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes? Is it a mistake here? A human-typo replacing =E2=80=991=E2=80=99 by =E2=80= =999=E2=80=99? Or something else? Petr? Then, indeed KDE did a in-place replacement since the hash is now, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix download https://mirrors.xtom.de/kde/stable/release-service/22.04.3/= src/akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.JTZn04 >From https://mirrors.xtom.de/kde/stable/release-service/22.04.3/src/akregat= or-22.04.3.tar.xz... =E2=80=A6.04.3.tar.xz 2.2MiB = 22.2MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% /gnu/store/w4jqrza9ffsflim5ilwq7jr75rxicn1g-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz 08n713271i7ifnbrgwrqmxvcpvj45wfqjiidw8zf9rpwxg2m2m9g --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- as submitted in patch#57608 [1]. 1: Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 17 05:31:03 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 09:31:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okMSc-0008CY-OR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:31:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:44604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okMSa-0008BX-Tb for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:31:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id r13so17511264wrj.11 for <58561@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E9r/4i2uSvEnXX+eIfa0euRvrdSCsptVa3btmsCXu7o=; b=YsO/MTly3RwusNGzoIQsy9BU49QKqe8LKTdmNWTSE1EX/ExBlhaMpCCVGvuBD8VI0F h97EmyKrPMMHNU8zLfw9JCYRxF326Uh733/XWLKz2kXpBIUE4X7FMveXRJ9OSBcTwm/r yRqbReYixFBZOXNbCpvmbaT2uJ/d/ghAst/e/BhB5EgFwaoSltVSWm6Jq+uDO1tMrolD LjlbJtuIeKzW5tMcPTv+0ri5tf34T1d3VF8YE7oG3fFCy5J+7tzB7nqngeJSclPi4AVv eLW+is84QZPbDTXByOKTmkM9tI04Kq7YejXkTY9R163dZ8vv50lHGOb28Sh0w+3CTFXM pepQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E9r/4i2uSvEnXX+eIfa0euRvrdSCsptVa3btmsCXu7o=; b=t27gHn0dA+KMeaUnruw0jc2h5fDygMcpKyh6ISQYJrFflntRIryei6GR/11D91YJSN ov2FHf3tlW+wZ50AUmaVEEMaNviYpzu7ImN+dfB/ukAVVEizlxIQ4bzO8muUBHKSq+iS u42ZHnr97wvXDzQhFuhHenooRVTXZAxdxuVOb3AKP3seHCYX41BzPM7zClnqj2YDBeCj hnHsRW3bb5Bj+MNyAEf009ovdpXCRj0fmXocjXPrpy62mzOXeliuJbUl1dMxVBLqWwd0 qvYfegoU0WZtrPzcarqJ2pqB4aYLx8YWZLk235FPhJZaLU6Kp5fzqvsoNxRtipn4ISDc z2Cg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3/gpU27JVE4zFUNQQX5Z/nsgsQdxzICVNZWopMTtEa7BESwP9I 9ZVgQYl/x7Q+RLtoRGHfgIXgPh7XqWw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4kTypOJ2J2zJEKM6rvMA0yVCZZuwTNHwLATxizPrLls8DjeNxAsy0SSQquOMn/Y0tzlpnfGA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce8b:0:b0:22c:dea6:6ea with SMTP id r11-20020adfce8b000000b0022cdea606eamr5468524wrn.387.1665999055355; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1-20020a056000136100b002301c026acasm7981512wrz.85.2022.10.17.02.30.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:30:55 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , mail@brendan.scot Subject: Re: bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes. In-Reply-To: <87y1tgulqk.fsf@nckx> References: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> <87y1tgulqk.fsf@nckx> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:49:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87tu42n8ch.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Tobias, On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 11:45, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Oh! This is a fun one! Oh, cool! Thanks for explaining. > What Guix could do is refuse to continue when it detects set > higher bits, as they always indicate programmer error. Do you mean another linter? Or something else? As a field checker? Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 17 07:42:20 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 11:42:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okOVg-0005hw-7d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:42:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okOVf-0005hk-3f for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:42:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okOVZ-0008B4-8v; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:42:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=nHg/bstkUYH2NewUYjc6qZ1BWRS2sXeldfI3bwerLlg=; b=jZ+Z2fGIgQBRzPDxYk6Y JO2s8gILrC1MHKwOUg9aRgbN4gcNcdrhcPHRha9Z3MC4E+r6+ISuktLSERyjOjE1qCvN4kZFeOV6o Pcxrsq4S9561HRFNqVsiWOLpaTPzl94gxXFqTUdLLs/VrAKWqlQnw7TnENn/oj7SQPvJPKHQX5Dww Zi+zM0Q6DQMGnzcSXVkzNwOWtImeHpBZJejmAhS2mY80re9V0EKLV4nPhv2vQQTLNnA4dikR2k1Lt n4uc3HSE3vgs/7DJoNKIMzXSQKqDxknjqn80paKMbYg500rIlId5vGxt43AUvbxAHhEi4x/MKhRR+ LDTHljr4EqBivw==; Received: from [84.211.203.64] (port=58184 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okOVY-0003bE-4U; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:42:12 -0400 From: Marius Bakke To: phodina , 'Brendan Tildesley Subject: Re: bug#58561: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: akregator: Fix build. In-Reply-To: References: <20221016043321.23138-1-mail@brendan.scot> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:42:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmeqvfqo.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain phodina via Bug reports for GNU Guix skriver: > Hi, > > unfortunately incorrect hash was pushed in the last patchset. > > The patch is already part of the next patch series [1]. > > Also it's tracked here [2]. > > 1 https://github.com/phodina/guix/commit/4636279dfb3b96eb5836baad0d8ea36e58ff79ee > 2 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57608#8 Whoops, I had missed these patches and pushed similar fixes to 'master': 8681d90d50 gnu: akgregator: Fix source hash. 3d8c243efb gnu: akgregator: Fix build. Sorry for the duplicate work Brendan & Petr! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEARYKAC0WIQRNTknu3zbaMQ2ddzTocYulkRQQdwUCY00/kA8cbWFyaXVzQGdu dS5vcmcACgkQ6HGLpZEUEHfxCQEAlSB4Na7mgTUUburrKUnn2XUQew/g2ZWdumJV CkjTIs8A/Rc5dDnjmtaTfXDtXkwmfvMqwNllKoZM6CWWs2ifnm4L =Rhy5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 17 14:29:25 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 18:29:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okUrc-0002QO-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:29:25 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:25921) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okUra-0002Q7-LA for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:29:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:29:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1666031356; x=1666290556; bh=MktP1jLL/+U131amRyiPZ0k7pejX+2sSDt5xcZWtf+0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=t1lWfKpmjXyQ03z2wwoHUJSblYnNiBBK9laqp/DQOj/m5ZBw6PqNxmaP5niKMFmFf oEC0AN7480z8plRNF5pDdl6z2oAV4wmf7yqPbn1xyAvGemnva7uUhmjyXPMOwEOu/K t4q6ACYieRmRaUAVozEnmbd1+/1kh5cPCTCK6rkqiJxxKUqyas/WGk+hL3lyl4g9u7 bh/ykKZswDjsmY+wVJvuZqv35dgFaN+3VPgwzj2A+1paEh5JsRGPPM0X41uDg2KzHv ocm3qDQcLZSqDErSjR9nmyORMzLu0YFRGjYTRzsUw2OGWpnkk3SsM/QSFEfJS3t642 03eQqivNTdB9A== To: zimoun From: phodina Subject: Re: bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87y1ten8jy.fsf@gmail.com> References: <0df50579-d645-5a43-d558-4c49e503bb57@brendan.scot> <87y1ten8jy.fsf@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 14143818:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@brendan.scot, Marius Bakke X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Simon, > Indeed, commit 6971feca53a19d60fdd2b39fb2a8966ccf1d6598 pushed on > core-updates reads, >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >=20 > (define-public akregator > (package > (name "akregator") > - (version "21.12.3") > + (version "22.04.3") > (source > (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append "mirror://kde/stable/release-service/" version > "/src/akregator-" version ".tar.xz")) > (sha256 > - (base32 "1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")))) > + (base32 "9yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8")))) > (build-system qt-build-system) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >=20 > > Is there a bug with how guix is reading/writing sha256 hashes? >=20 >=20 > Is it a mistake here? A human-typo replacing =E2=80=991=E2=80=99 by = =E2=80=999=E2=80=99? Or > something else? Petr? It's just typo. I used mostly guix refresh for large part of the packages. = Guess I updated this one manually or somehow cast wrong incantation in Vim. Sorry for my mistake. I tried to check most of the changes I made in the pa= tch series but this one slipped through in the many rounds of rebuilding Qt= and KDE. ---- Petr From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 17 17:19:46 2022 Received: (at 58561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 21:19:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okXWU-0000ql-8O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:19:46 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:43940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okXWF-0000qL-Gg for 58561@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:19:45 -0400 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Mrqcq1TKXz9sS1; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:19:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1666041563; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2b2AXr+mIWqfyD8njrWHs0i0HH9djVy/m0IHQswS2YQ=; b=StGznUPIZlD898mlpiWz5e3QCF+wyWRlVhIlNJu5fxMMoTjHd1Bj58SmCsZe4Kav4MQGmi sdtM4eSBb4gsyzzNkThQQPUBsvTD7PobweEx6xDF7SLzHk7fBRAvTQCgF0z3hYn9YrM/Zl f292Ul+4gATbJqjBQAUli7D1+MvW6VHsLoUvtp43EinxJ8x2bSEiV5fxn3l/LW8q/xfHuV tK+9KPoyYcBydYAiiQx6Cnjce7lBq74zxUiuLh34FAQ8mPfWhcPO7Ld3DPL+HJLZ4lfI2h OMp53NwdBhjn9KMA0qoqSXe5j/4Q+TX4KP0F5E+ZryTvVOiWw5yQuQbLKZN2gg== Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:19:10 +1100 From: Brendan Tildesley To: phodina Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: akregator: Fix build. In-Reply-To: References: <20221016043321.23138-1-mail@brendan.scot> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=----63QX7QNGWH3FZ6KV3NEVHYJCEBGJW2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Mrqcq1TKXz9sS1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561 Cc: 58561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) ------63QX7QNGWH3FZ6KV3NEVHYJCEBGJW2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On October 16, 2022 4:39:16 PM GMT+11:00, phodina wrote: >Hi, > >unfortunately incorrect hash was pushed in the last patchset=2E > >The patch is already part of the next patch series [1]=2E > >Also it's tracked here [2]=2E > >1 https://github=2Ecom/phodina/guix/commit/4636279dfb3b96eb5836baad0d8ea3= 6e58ff79ee >2 https://issues=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/57608#8 > >---- >Petr > > > > >Sent with Proton Mail secure email=2E > >------- Original Message ------- >On Sunday, October 16th, 2022 at 6:33 AM, 'Brendan Tildesley wrote: > > >> From: Brendan Tildesley mail@brendan=2Escot >>=20 >>=20 >> * gnu/packages/kde=2Escm (akregator)[phases]: Fix finding >> QtWebEngineProcess path=2E >> --- >> gnu/packages/kde=2Escm | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde=2Escm b/gnu/packages/kde=2Escm >> index 37125b1d0b=2E=2Ed0ffb28505 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/kde=2Escm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/kde=2Escm >> @@ -167,9 +167,8 @@ (define-public akregator >> (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) >> (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) >> (bin (string-append out "/bin/akregator")) >> - (qt-process-path (string-append >> - (assoc-ref inputs "qtwebengine-5") >> - "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) >> + (qt-process-path (search-input-file >> + inputs "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess"))) >> (wrap-program bin >> `("QTWEBENGINEPROCESS_PATH" =3D (,qt-process-path))))))))) >> (native-inputs >> -- >> 2=2E37=2E2 I think the correct way is to use something like search-input-file instead= ungexping qtwebengine-5, right? Input transformations well not work otherw= ise? ------63QX7QNGWH3FZ6KV3NEVHYJCEBGJW2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On October 16, 2022 4:3= 9:16 PM GMT+11:00, phodina <phodina@protonmail=2Ecom> wrote: 
Hi,

unfortunately incorrect hash=
 was pushed in the last patchset=2E

The patch is already part of the=
 next patch series [1]=2E

Also it's tracked here [2]=2E

1 https://github=2Ecom/phodina/guix/commit/4636279dfb3b96eb58=
36baad0d8ea36e58ff79ee
2 https://issues=2Eguix=2Egnu=2Eorg/57608#8
Petr



Sent with Proton Mail secure email=2E

------- Original Mess=
age -------
On Sunday, October 16th, 2022 at 6:33 AM, 'Brendan Tildesley=
 <mail@brendan=2Escot> wrote:


From: Brendan Tildesley mail@brendan=2Escot

* gnu/packages/kde=2Escm (akregator)[phases]: Fix finding
QtWebEnginePr=
ocess path=2E
gnu/packages/kde=2Escm | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 inse=
rtions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde=2Escm b/gnu/=
packages/kde=2Escm
index 37125b1d0b=2E=2Ed0ffb28505 100644
--- a/gnu/=
packages/kde=2Escm
+++ b/gnu/packages/kde=2Escm
@@ -167,9 +167,8 @@ (=
define-public akregator
(lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-key=
s)
(let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
(bin (string-append out "/b=
in/akregator"))
- (qt-process-path (string-append
- (assoc-ref inputs=
 "qtwebengine-5")
- "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess")))
+ (qt-pr=
ocess-path (search-input-file
+ inputs "/lib/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProc=
ess")))
(wrap-program bin
`("QTWEBENGINEPROCESS_PATH" =3D (,qt-proces=
s-path)))))))))
(native-inputs
--
2=2E37=2E2

I think the correct way is to use som= ething like search-input-file instead ungexping qtwebengine-5, right? Input= transformations well not work otherwise?
------63QX7QNGWH3FZ6KV3NEVHYJCEBGJW2-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 12 21:56:42 2023 Received: (at 58561-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2023 01:56:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pxeV0-0007Xp-3K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2023 21:56:42 -0400 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.152]:36754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pxeUx-0007XZ-LD for 58561-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2023 21:56:41 -0400 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QJ7z3159Sz9sWk for <58561-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 13 May 2023 03:56:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brendan.scot; s=MBO0001; t=1683942991; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+d84mP+svyV7E3CV0ltZt9pbKKnJYFgPjne6YmSyMEA=; b=E21O5SaNC0kCMH/YRY9Ct0BL4aAUjrF0Cy3Q4W69kl2gvV70SGPjRE+YwEWoXYpLbDqXws ziq56vcUoADloAgcuXDKmUOS98bFsrCdJfzggdUZlWPUEyn0r8gTLdpBvm9QKTXkcnmBxx 7kEmIXyqobGFIehNw2y7FEs+5LptSRInsaKHfg/g1kC38dEZGaQrB3ghBB6KmVFQbNOwB/ wTUQdHdw8hH0gcD/dA4QgMvUFtb8GxGqEeR30euQZ+pxFbjucoAwdN4lvMiyxz+ovYBZoe 2kTWo7XReb78c3UTxusi4DOyMwkxIZip59hy4rFsAOyDjutsePpcjBLtQldxMg== Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 01:56:23 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 58561-close@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes. Content-Language: en-US From: Brendan Tildesley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 58561-close X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: mail@brendan.scot Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Issue was fixed and Tobias explained the hash issue. From unknown Fri Sep 19 21:29:42 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator