Package: emacs;
Reported by: Göran Uddeborg <goeran <at> uddeborg.se>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:26:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Fixed in version 30.1
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
View this message in rfc822 format
From: Vincent Belaïche <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> Cc: 5852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Vincent Belaïche <vincentbelaiche <at> orange.fr>, Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>, Göran Uddeborg <goeran <at> uddeborg.se> Subject: bug#5852: 23.1; Incorrect references in ses-mode Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 08:38:26 +0200
Just to say that I did the test manually on my home PC a couple of time, and I could not reproduce the problem. That is quite annoying, yesterday I reproduced it on my office PC once. V. Le dim. 25 juil. 2021 à 08:32, Vincent Belaïche <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> a écrit : > > By doing the test manually on my home PC I found some interesting > difference. After > > 2 RET > > on my home PC the cursor goes to the end of buffer narrowed region, > while on my office PC it goes to B2. This means that the TAB that > follows won't the same effect. On my home PC it creates a 3rd row, > while on my office PC it creates the 3rd column. > I found the reason why so : my home PC had some customization for the > ses-after-entry-functions. After erasing customization I had the same > behaviour … > Anyway, that does not affect the bug-5852 test function as it only > uses ses-jump for motion. > V. > > Le dim. 25 juil. 2021 à 08:18, Vincent Belaïche > <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > The bug-5852 test function does not reproduce the bug on my home PC either … > > V. > > > > Le dim. 25 juil. 2021 à 08:17, Vincent Belaïche > > <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > The same test function, but with comments : > > > > > > > > > (defun bug-5852 ();;--- > > > "Check no irrelevant reference is created when a row is inserted and > > > a formula is yanked" > > > (interactive);;--- > > > (let ((ses-initial-size '(3 . 3))); size before last row insertion, > > > due to all preceding TAB & C-o > > > (with-temp-buffer > > > (ses-mode) > > > (dolist (val '( > > > (ses-edit-cell 0 1 1) ; 1 RET > > > (ses-edit-cell 1 0 2) ; 2 RET > > > (ses-edit-cell 1 1 (+ B1 A2)) ; ( + SPC B1 SPC A2 RET > > > (ses-edit-cell 2 0 3) ; 3 RET > > > (ses-edit-cell 2 1 (+ B2 A3)) ; ( + SPC B2 SPC A3 RET > > > (ses-jump A3) ; C-n > > > (ses-insert-row 1) ; C-o > > > (ses-edit-cell 2 0 4) ; 4 RET > > > (ses-jump B2) ; C-p > > > )) > > > (apply 'funcall-interactively val) > > > (ses-command-hook)) > > > (let ((beg (point-marker))); C-SPC > > > (ses-jump 'C2) ; C-f > > > (copy-region-as-kill beg (point) nil); M-w > > > (set-marker beg nil)) > > > (dolist (val '( > > > (ses-jump B3); C-n C-b > > > (yank) ; C-y > > > (ses-jump B4); C-n > > > (yank); C-y > > > )) > > > (apply 'funcall-interactively val) > > > (ses-command-hook)) > > > (ses-repair-cell-reference-all) > > > ))) > > > > > > Le dim. 25 juil. 2021 à 07:56, Vincent Belaïche > > > <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > On more significant difference between the function bug-5852 and the > > > > example is the the initial size is (3 . 3) instead of (1. 1). This is > > > > because I speculated that only the last row insertion (C-o) plays a > > > > role. > > > > > > > > V. > > > > > > > > Le dim. 25 juil. 2021 à 07:48, Vincent Belaïche > > > > <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > Just to add something : reading again SES code, and (info "(elisp) > > > > > Command Overview") I am a bit skeptical about the explanation in my > > > > > previous email. > > > > > It seems that only key strokes are queue, but command execution and > > > > > post command hook are in sequence, so not done concurrently. > > > > > I wrote this function to try to reproduce the bug, and on my office PC > > > > > it does not reproduce it: > > > > > > > > > > (defun bug-5852 ();;--- > > > > > "Check no irrelevant reference is created when a row is inserted and > > > > > a formula is yanked" > > > > > (interactive);;--- > > > > > (let ((ses-initial-size '(3 . 3))) > > > > > (with-temp-buffer > > > > > (ses-mode) > > > > > (dolist (val '( > > > > > (ses-edit-cell 0 1 1) > > > > > (ses-edit-cell 1 0 2) > > > > > (ses-edit-cell 1 1 (+ B1 A2)) > > > > > (ses-edit-cell 2 0 3) > > > > > (ses-edit-cell 2 1 (+ B2 A3)) > > > > > (ses-jump A3) > > > > > (ses-insert-row 1) > > > > > (ses-edit-cell 2 0 4) > > > > > (ses-jump B2) > > > > > )) > > > > > (apply 'funcall-interactively val) > > > > > (ses-command-hook)) > > > > > (let ((beg (point-marker))) > > > > > (ses-jump 'C2) ; C-n > > > > > (copy-region-as-kill beg (point) nil) > > > > > (set-marker beg nil)) > > > > > (dolist (val '( > > > > > (ses-jump B3) > > > > > (yank) > > > > > (ses-jump B4) > > > > > (yank) > > > > > )) > > > > > (apply 'funcall-interactively val) > > > > > (ses-command-hook)) > > > > > (ses-repair-cell-reference-all) > > > > > ))) > > > > > > > > > > Please note that the main difference with the provided example is that > > > > > motion is done with ses-jump, and not with motion commands. Also the > > > > > save to keyring is not done interatively. > > > > > V. > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 24 juil. 2021 à 23:46, Vincent Belaïche > > > > > <vincent.belaiche <at> gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Lars, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for not making any feedback for so long, actually I was just > > > > > > distracted by some other business, and I somewhat had forgotten about > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect a race condition between the post command hook and the next > > > > > > command. That is to say when one yanks the fomula (the first yank), > > > > > > one relocates the reference but for this one uses current references > > > > > > that have not yet been relocated because the previous post-command > > > > > > hook execution is not yet over. > > > > > > > > > > > > The bug does not show every time I do the experiment. I tried this > > > > > > morning with my office PC which is a fast machine, and it proved out > > > > > > quite hard to reproduce, even when I launched some big C program > > > > > > compilation in parallel to eat the mips. > > > > > > > > > > > > Next week I will do some experiment with my home PC which is quite > > > > > > quite slower, and I make some feedback. Unfortunateless both machine > > > > > > do not have the same emacs version, but anyway all changes in SES > > > > > > since the version on my home PC are not related to this bug, so > > > > > > nevertheless that will be a good indication whether my guess is > > > > > > correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > V. > > > > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 18 juil. 2021 à 15:37, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vincent Belaïche <vincentbelaiche <at> orange.fr> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will investigate why and feed back once I have a better idea of what > > > > > > > > is happening. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this was a year ago. Did you make any progress on this issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > > > > > > > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.