GNU bug report logs - #58495
opam import generates wrong check phase

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#58495: closed (opam import generates wrong check phase)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 21:07:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2023 22:06:06 +0100
with message-id <20230128220606.69a7a456 <at> sybil.lepiller.eu>
and subject line Re: bug#58495: opam import generates wrong check phase
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #58495,
regarding opam import generates wrong check phase
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
58495: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58495
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Csepp <raingloom <at> riseup.net>
To: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: opam import generates wrong check phase
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:03:43 +0200

So I'm working on building MirageOS unikernels with Guix, which means
using the OPAM importer *a lot*, which unearths some very Fun TM bugs.
Here is the first one:

guix import opam mirage-clock

The correct check phase is this:
```
(replace 'check
           (lambda* (#:key tests? #:allow-other-keys)
             (invoke "dune" "runtest" "--release")))
```

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
To: Csepp <raingloom <at> riseup.net>
Cc: 58495-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#58495: opam import generates wrong check phase
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 22:06:06 +0100

Le Sat, 28 Jan 2023 20:28:59 +0100,
Csepp <raingloom <at> riseup.net> a écrit :

> Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
> 
> > Le Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:16:18 +0200,
> > Csepp <raingloom <at> riseup.net> a écrit :
> >  
> >> Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
> >>   
> >> > Maybe this could be fixed in the dune-build-system?
> >> >    
> >> Actually, good call.  I'll look into it, unless you want to take a
> >> stab at it.  
> >
> > With the test-target argument removed, do you consider this fixed?  
> 
> Yup, it's fixed now, thanks for closing these.

Closing, thanks

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.