GNU bug report logs -
#58442
[PATCH 0/1] Add EditorConfig specification.
Previous Next
Reported by: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:14:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 58442 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 58442 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This patch adds a .editorconfig file to the project root. This is especially
useful for ~~nonbelievers~~ non-Emacs users.
( (1):
Add EditorConfig specification.
.editorconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .editorconfig
--
2.38.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 58442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* .editorconfig: New file.
---
.editorconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .editorconfig
diff --git a/.editorconfig b/.editorconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bc68ff24c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.editorconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+root = true
+
+[*.{c,h,cpp,hpp,el,scm,ac,am,m4,po}{,.in}]
+end_of_line = lf
+insert_final_newline = true
+charset = utf-8
+trim_trailing_whitespace = true
+
+[*.{c,h,cpp,hpp,ac,am,m4,el,scm}{,.in}]
+max_line_length = 85
+
+[*.{c,h,cpp,hpp,ac,m4,el,scm}{,.in}]
+indent_style = space
+
+[*.{c,h,cpp,hpp}{,.in}]
+indent_size = 4
--
2.38.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:16:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi!
"( via Guix-patches" via 写道:
> * .editorconfig: New file.
All these values LGTM, but I use the correct editor.
> max_line_length = 85
As discussed on IRC, it's obvious to ‘us’ what this really means,
but I wonder if it's universal. Unless someone disagrees, I think
it's OK.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:33:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Dienstag, dem 11.10.2022 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-
Rice:
> Hi!
>
> "( via Guix-patches" via 写道:
> > * .editorconfig: New file.
>
> All these values LGTM, but I use the correct editor.
>
> > max_line_length = 85
>
> As discussed on IRC, it's obvious to ‘us’ what this really means,
> but I wonder if it's universal. Unless someone disagrees, I think
> it's OK.
If I recall correctly, the correct editor uses 79 as fill-column. Even
if extended URLs are nasty in other editors, as discussed in IRC, I'd
claim that to be "a good thing", because the failed word-wrapping shows
the writer how nasty that'd be and makes them use string-append.
Cheers
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 58442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
"( via Guix-patches" via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> This patch adds a .editorconfig file to the project root. This is especially
> useful for ~~nonbelievers~~ non-Emacs users.
>
> ( (1):
> Add EditorConfig specification.
>
> .editorconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 .editorconfig
Is this just waiting to be merged? It seems fine to me, although I
probably won't notice it's addition.
Given it's easy to change, I don't think we need to do much upfront
review.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
"(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 58442-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:
> "( via Guix-patches" via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> This patch adds a .editorconfig file to the project root. This is especially
>> useful for ~~nonbelievers~~ non-Emacs users.
>>
>> ( (1):
>> Add EditorConfig specification.
>>
>> .editorconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 .editorconfig
>
> Is this just waiting to be merged? It seems fine to me, although I
> probably won't notice it's addition.
>
> Given it's easy to change, I don't think we need to do much upfront
> review.
I've gone ahead and pushed this as
6123f0e467aa5249f0a497c89ce434222702a535.
Thanks,
Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58442
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 58442-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sat Nov 5, 2022 at 10:50 AM GMT, Christopher Baines wrote:
> I've gone ahead and pushed this as
> 6123f0e467aa5249f0a497c89ce434222702a535.
Thanks!
-- (
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:24:09 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 258 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.