GNU bug report logs -
#58383
29.0.50; Make it easier to invert vc-prepare-patches-separately
Previous Next
Reported by: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 17:50:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Found in version 29.0.50
Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue 08 Nov 2022 at 08:31PM GMT, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
>> Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name> writes:
>>
>>>>> On the other hand, having a numeric prefix argument mean "send patches
>>>>> correspoding to the top N revisions of the current branch" would be very
>>>>> convenient. Perhaps these two could be combined by using a negative
>>>>> number to mean also invert?
>>>>
>>>> This is the usual problem with numeric prefix arguments. You don't get
>>>> that much expressivity with just an integer.
>>>>
>>>> That is why I would hesitate to assign any particular interpretation to
>>>> prefix arguments, before considering and weighing the options.
>>>
>>> Well, any other options in mind? Varying the -N argument to
>>> git-format-patch/git-send-email is what I find myself using the most.
>>
>> The issue is finding a way for this to be expressed VC-generically.
>
> s/expressed/implemented/, right?
I meant expressed, but I don't remember what I meant ^^
So let's say implement. What we could do is just call
`previous-revision' for the backend N times, but with what file?
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 241 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.