Subject: Re: bug#58376: [PATCH] Set the PARENTS argument for language environments

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 12:20:02 +0200

> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 15:00:44 +0530
> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
> 
>  However, the second part of those patches makes little sense to me: if
>  these languages are considered to be part of "Indian" languages, why
>  leave them in "Misc"?  "Misc" is for languages that have no "parent"
>  family.
> 
> Kharoshthi is different from the Brahmic scripts in that it is not derived from Brahmi but instead from Aramaic.
> It was also used in regions not present in modern India.
> But it was used to write Indian languages, therefore it made sense to me to include it in both Indian and Misc. 

I'm okay with "Indian".  It's "Misc" that I question.  Would it be
okay to have these only in "Indian"?