GNU bug report logs - #58338
29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #31 received at 58338-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 58338-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in
 obarray?
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:51:43 +0000

Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On 22-10-06 20:28 , Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 22-10-06 20:21 , Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>>>
>>>> In that case what confuses me is that (length obarray) doesn't throw an
>>>> error.  Or what useful information does that give me?
>>>
>>> It's a vector, and each vector has a length.
>> But isn't the fact that it is a vector just a detail of the internal
>> implementation?
>
> It's all history.  Obarray existed since the Big Bang.  Don't use it.

OK, then I'll close the report.  But if I am not supposed to use the
obarrays, what would you recommend if I want to count the number of
known symbols?  (Context:  I am trying to detect all variables defined
in a package, and since that takes a while I wrapped the `mapatoms' call in
a progress reporter, that needs a maximal value).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.