From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:28:50 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#5833 <5833@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#5833 <5833@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow Reply-To: bug#5833 <5833@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:28:50 +0000 retitle 5833 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow reassign 5833 emacs submitter 5833 Mathias Dahl severity 5833 normal tag 5833 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 03 17:35:05 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2010 21:35:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAzh-0007jZ-1G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:35:05 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAiV-0007cT-2Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:17:19 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:53940) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAiQ-0003AO-QK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:17:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NyAiQ-0004zZ-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:17:14 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60649 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NyAiO-0004z4-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:17:13 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAiM-0005n4-6R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:17:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:56701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyAiM-0005ms-0g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:17:10 -0400 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so63747wwf.0 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:received :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xiu/PqR5yMTLZZ6nUq4+G9VY2KivJOE4D5sO/EeW1tQ=; b=pgflOqRDNN2A3kQ6CmPppKjNnsPAop35d2UteRpRIAGALJW2uu1x1JnHhQl0uu3w6Y K4ECDCJ73HKaocqUeILY8sz2DVPw4gb810pTQxjCvsyqt30fH1uQQRyL52Kd7hh86yw6 MINIGKh0j9quXBxKvnj+Xo+WJz7p68/PvhgWQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=aUANUfbGUNxlz/AIzZpL8Otr6Ig8Y5qmIE4d1mLmGvCxFg6Xb8sMyLTIoKHr06lr/y Jw/rNwzdnmCdoW7wr5SkshInwbqpAmuFGw61Bosli/eYqolX36GDYJZEKq5WxRKgm9Fs HwkqhKEZ0BRcW+M61iNe9+yK5i+8HnvGiToLw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.171.139 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:16:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Mathias Dahl Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:16:48 +0200 Received: by 10.216.89.195 with SMTP id c45mr2231243wef.98.1270329428167; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:35:04 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) This bug report will be sent to the Free Software Foundation, not to your local site managers! Please write in English if possible, because the Emacs maintainers usually do not have translators to read other languages for them. Your bug report will be posted to the bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org mailing list, and to the gnu.emacs.bug news group. Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug and the precise symptoms of the bug. If you can, give a recipe starting from `emacs -Q': I did this: emacs -Q C-x C-f //some_server/some_share/ RET Then, on some file in Dired, opened a file with f or RET. This operation is much slower than the same operation done using Notepad. For a file about 80 KB in size it takes about one second in Notepad and 5-6 seconds in Emacs. I have tried some tips found in old threads about this, like turning off some vc-parameter and some parameter controlling whether extra properties should be fetched (or something like that) for shares. No effect though. Opening local files is blazingly fast. If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, please include the output from the following gdb commands: `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. For information about debugging Emacs, please read the file d:/pgm/emacs/etc/DEBUG. In GNU Emacs 23.1.94.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-03-23 on G41R2F1 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/imagesupport/include' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: SVE value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Dired by name Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: C-x C-f C-y M-: C-y q M-: C-y q C-x k C-x k M-x f i n d SPC f i l SPC l i 5 1 0 0 C-x k C C-a C-k c =D6 - : / m u u . t x t C-x C-f C-x k C-h c f f C-x k Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Entering debugger... Back to top level. nil Copy: 1 of 1 Copy: 1 file f runs the command dired-find-file Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr message ecomplete rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 qp ietf-drums mailabbrev nnheader gnus-util netrc time-date mm-util mail-prsvr gmm-utils wid-edit mailheader canlock sha1 hex-util hashcash mail-utils emacsbug dired-aux help-mode easymenu view debug dired regexp-opt tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 04 02:00:22 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2010 06:00:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyIsg-0003j7-GP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 02:00:22 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyIsd-0003j2-VE for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 02:00:21 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0C00K008HRRI00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:00:15 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0C00IPR8O8H060@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:00:15 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:00:12 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Mathias Dahl Message-id: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:16:48 +0200 > Cc: > > emacs -Q > C-x C-f //some_server/some_share/ RET > Then, on some file in Dired, opened a file with f or RET. > > This operation is much slower than the same operation done using > Notepad. For a file about 80 KB in size it takes about one second in > Notepad and 5-6 seconds in Emacs. Does it help to set w32-get-true-file-attributes to a nil value? Also, is this a regression in the last pretest? IOW, when was the last time you tried visiting files on that remote file system and it was much faster than what you see now with 23.1.94? Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 08:06:23 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 12:06:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyl4Q-0007iQ-C2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:06:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NykbC-0007Xt-Qa for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 07:36:11 -0400 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so1523968wyb.3 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:36:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dWMqff+YJ06KfCLHP49kEkjltPE+cSaK6JoWmbwNFhw=; b=BBQjKuESDyqpwaP8Guib74oWufP9CGAsUl3tbxnyd3Q+7tGtKINZUqSRRFHf2HPnKM 7A8llNVDLNuHfEGehbVi0NF7/M59d7/sM/SbvQAWHgugspre71Hch7XZcwSz7DG5ilnE KZC3+hnX0oKb4566cKc/QgK3UfOB89eEvn/V0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RVXn4XaUOKtIDLDQeXQ3nMa1AT/8NIIuBsj7xcD/hVNRGL0wpkP0L1GPMfBb0T2UUR UU96mJgNJ/d1vALjHYCNdT8cNf9KiiiEAiA/Uz29cmlYdq8jpHFbI6rqOlguMNyceO4m 0+DrU9nwaEcG3U98FcZs0b2CEsfevR8c1UqKE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.171.139 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 04:35:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mathias Dahl Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:35:44 +0200 Received: by 10.216.155.196 with SMTP id j46mr3227979wek.1.1270467364259; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:06:20 -0400 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) Hi, Eli, thanks for looking into this! > Does it help to set w32-get-true-file-attributes to a nil value? No. > Also, is this a regression in the last pretest? =A0IOW, when was the > last time you tried visiting files on that remote file system and it > was much faster than what you see now with 23.1.94? As far as I can see this has been slow for quite a while. I have recently reinstalled my PC so I don't have the old versions with me. I downloaded 22.3 and it was even slower. Last year (I think it was) I reported a similar issue, which was fixed. That performance issue could be worked around by setting the variable above. That problem was even worse though. The reason I have noticed this at all is that one of our servers has moved to another office lately, so the network of course plays a role in this. However, there is still the question what Emacs does that Notepad don't (well, I know, a lot, but computers are fast nowadays) that makes for the difference in opening files on shares (it could be a problem locally as well but maybe it is so fast that I don't notice). Just now I tested this scenario in the latest pretest: I opened (from Dired) a file only 800 bytes in size. It took 7 seconds. I then opened another file, over 100 000 bytes and that also took 7 seconds. Opening the larger of the files in Notepad takes just above a second. If there are any other tests I can do, please let me know. I currently don't have a way to compile the source myself on w32, just so that you know. Thanks! /Mathias From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 08:34:21 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 12:34:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylVU-0007sv-Tm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:34:21 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylVS-0007sq-Ud for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:34:20 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0E00C00KVSSA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:33:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0E0072FLJX4ZG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:33:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:33:40 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Mathias Dahl Message-id: <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:35:44 +0200 > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > Just now I tested this scenario in the latest pretest: I opened (from > Dired) a file only 800 bytes in size. It took 7 seconds. I then opened > another file, over 100 000 bytes and that also took 7 seconds. Opening > the larger of the files in Notepad takes just above a second. 7 seconds is an eternity for such small files. Btw, is "C-x C-f" faster than Dired, by any chance? > If there are any other tests I can do, please let me know. Can you tell if setting the following variables has any effect? (setq vc-handled-backends nil) (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") (Please try them one by one, in that order.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 14:16:14 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 18:16:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyqqM-0001c5-H0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:16:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyqqK-0001by-GN for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:16:13 -0400 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so612458ewy.15 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:16:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tp6YePHD34xP3OZh5cDDAQFnzHG/as22P/Lkuux274g=; b=hu8+MuoafGriDEDsV/f3O02OQHgH3mwzxOZ76edoeAwRR1wgOic838Sq6wlTGTUnJx XiuqZMFz2D8W+AFxnFzwyFi9ToG3So6fRNIsZ4dC8S9Js2IpSDk0Ggp+tB3jOZKg+SEm zZzepS9nFi2XaXhqAuxcD2KYHI98UgUOk4/DI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cPsVwBK5JKy4rHr8LOjQonXff3RhE+TgWZB0dD45MAkmxRgjJbTzwR8Vc3fwQ6TTzu DewPBL2bLG33TOPfRC+XF8jlVI8Jwq9tRpPt0aUkItFOMPdkjx3LqAYtEtnxGj6AfYOh 5b8crmihTnOT6Wj9HFxXo8/9Pp/PApO7g3XWA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.9.129 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:15:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mathias Dahl Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:15:47 +0200 Received: by 10.213.42.73 with SMTP id r9mr1642226ebe.40.1270491367207; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > 7 seconds is an eternity for such small files. I know :) > Btw, is "C-x C-f" faster than Dired, by any chance? No, at least not enough to be measured with a stop watch. > Can you tell if setting the following variables has any effect? > > =A0(setq vc-handled-backends nil) >From having taken close to 8 seconds (tried repeatedly), after this change it takes almost 6, so 2 s better. Still a long time, but better. > =A0(setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") That maybe shaves off half a second. Again, hard to done any scientific tests using a physical stop watch. /Mathias From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 16:15:20 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 20:15:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyshb-0002Ie-TG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:15:20 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nysha-0002IZ-Qg for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:15:19 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAN7huUvO+K6K/2dsb2JhbACbTHK3SYUHBIsq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,366,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="60249655" Received: from 206-248-174-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.174.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2010 16:15:14 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 48F2C660BF; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:15:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Mathias Dahl Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow Message-ID: References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:15:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Mathias Dahl's message of "Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:15:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) >> =A0(setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") > That maybe shaves off half a second. Hmm... odd. That seemed like a pretty good guess (locate-dominating-file tends to suffer from such performance problems in some cases, and vc-handled-backends is one user of this function, and dir-locals is another, so setting locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp should really kill it off). > Again, hard to done any scientific tests using a physical stop watch. That's OK. When we find the culprit, it should bring the time down to something significantly lower: no need for a stopwatch. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 17:04:23 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 21:04:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NytT5-0002bY-7W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:04:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NytT3-0002bT-3s for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:04:21 -0400 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so677014ewy.15 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:04:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f3/EgJplVE2sAe34ft92cUjAts7REfIQz64SzKe3z3g=; b=mrHl/egeM20jLFDQ3eYzwPsDm9uZ2xksIPb7LI1BfFXZPYHPbwdrd3vbqaKaUT4THQ IjulhlDoGTReFPlpLsdmppptORfCtmlo4AADqrqiLrg7jb9H9C3uZ+roVdcOtlxatsdL yhEdavN8C1Afw6LLMcjBbEet8ydAYTd/g2EPk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=X4xrSey5VBTWLsO2opfnh8DjOPY/Y6cjo5fjQeKpBXDsQ5CeYC1AMYlqMKCU51pynR Oxti70MzCJ1Eqp4Wmuo8xZ7WVwde57CDNB1CuO8fU+asqqSBaZJ9LN6eJ2DIiWljAvpQ gaV9W2uCENJf5LIkirB4H3cDGDYcvDQnoPjTU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.9.129 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:03:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mathias Dahl Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:03:55 +0200 Received: by 10.213.97.24 with SMTP id j24mr3178259ebn.48.1270501455843; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Stefan Monnier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) > That's OK. =A0When we find the culprit, it should bring the time down to > something significantly lower: no need for a stopwatch. Instead of using my stop watch I wrote a small elisp program (slow.el) to measure the time for me: (defun measure () (dotimes (i 10) (let ((time1 (float-time)) time2) (find-file "//corpnet/files/Archive/Archive75/docman/core/docman 5.11.0/docman/database/docman/index.cre") (setq time2 (float-time)) (kill-buffer) (message "Time elapsed: %s" (- time2 time1))))) (message "emacs -Q") (measure) (message "(setq vc-handled-backends nil)") (setq vc-handled-backends nil) (measure) (message "(setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp \"\")") (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") (measure) I started Emacs with -Q -l slow.el These are the results: emacs -Q Time elapsed: 7.5309998989105225 Time elapsed: 5.156000137329102 Time elapsed: 7.266000032424927 Time elapsed: 4.641000032424927 Time elapsed: 4.952999830245972 Time elapsed: 7.391000032424927 Time elapsed: 4.75 Time elapsed: 4.828000068664551 Time elapsed: 7.25 Time elapsed: 4.687000036239624 (setq vc-handled-backends nil) Time elapsed: 2.7659997940063477 Time elapsed: 5.125 Time elapsed: 2.4690001010894775 Time elapsed: 2.4839999675750732 Time elapsed: 2.7350001335144043 Time elapsed: 4.7809998989105225 Time elapsed: 2.8589999675750732 Time elapsed: 2.5160000324249268 Time elapsed: 2.6089999675750732 Time elapsed: 5.266000032424927 (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") Time elapsed: 2.187999963760376 Time elapsed: 1.937000036239624 Time elapsed: 1.9219999313354492 Time elapsed: 2.0160000324249268 Time elapsed: 4.5 Time elapsed: 1.9060001373291016 Time elapsed: 2.0159997940063477 Time elapsed: 2.078000068664551 Time elapsed: 1.9060001373291016 Time elapsed: 1.9059998989105225 The file to open is 801 bytes in size. No result is as bad as when I do RET in Dired, but maybe that is natural (maybe Emacs skips the redisplay). Right after the test above I did that and got the times 5, 5, 3, 5, 5 and 5 seconds, respectively. I again tested a few times with C-x C-f but there was no difference. The same test with another file in the same dir that has the size 113226 gives these results: emacs -Q Time elapsed: 7.578000068664551 Time elapsed: 5.141000032424927 Time elapsed: 5.014999866485596 Time elapsed: 7.391000032424927 Time elapsed: 4.812999963760376 Time elapsed: 5.062000036239624 Time elapsed: 7.812999963760376 Time elapsed: 4.733999967575073 Time elapsed: 7.375 Time elapsed: 5.937999963760376 (setq vc-handled-backends nil) Time elapsed: 5.234000205993652 Time elapsed: 2.671999931335449 Time elapsed: 2.578000068664551 Time elapsed: 2.8439998626708984 Time elapsed: 5.046999931335449 Time elapsed: 2.7660000324249268 Time elapsed: 3.015000104904175 Time elapsed: 2.671999931335449 Time elapsed: 5.141000032424927 Time elapsed: 2.578000068664551 (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") Time elapsed: 2.062999963760376 Time elapsed: 2.0149998664855957 Time elapsed: 2.2350001335144043 Time elapsed: 4.796999931335449 Time elapsed: 2.1089999675750732 Time elapsed: 2.125 Time elapsed: 2.0 Time elapsed: 2.0470001697540283 Time elapsed: 4.483999967575073 Time elapsed: 2.296999931335449 Slower but not in relation to the file size. Anyway, maybe the numbers will say something to you. /Mathias From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 17:58:43 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 21:58:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyuJf-0002tt-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:58:43 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyuJd-0002tn-AX for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:58:42 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0F00900BJQPV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:58:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0F0042UBPJ01E0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:58:32 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:58:39 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow In-reply-to: To: Mathias Dahl Message-id: <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:15:47 +0200 > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org >=20 > > Btw, is "C-x C-f" faster than Dired, by any chance? >=20 > No, at least not enough to be measured with a stop watch. >=20 > > Can you tell if setting the following variables has any effect? > > > > =A0(setq vc-handled-backends nil) >=20 > From having taken close to 8 seconds (tried repeatedly), after this > change it takes almost 6, so 2 s better. Still a long time, but > better. >=20 > > =A0(setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") >=20 > That maybe shaves off half a second. Again, hard to done any > scientific tests using a physical stop watch. That's strange: I thought they would slash much more. How about insert-file-contents and insert-file-contents-literally -- can you time those? Another idea is to use elp.el to profile the various functions called by find-file. At least for the Lisp level, we will see where's the bottleneck, and that might give some ideas. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 20:16:48 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2010 00:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NywTI-0003g6-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:16:48 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NywPy-0003eJ-IZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:22 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:44196) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NywPu-0006sD-KU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:18 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NywPt-0007og-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:17 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38951 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NywPr-0007oB-NT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.0 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NywPq-0005uq-AI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:15 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.210.176]:46842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NywPq-0005ud-73 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:14 -0400 Received: by yxe6 with SMTP id 6so1110881yxe.27 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:13:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ifzf3IKBzKhH30ovfvrI7Q3+5pOUbL142+22U7LlLBM=; b=ItR3Pe7lLi/fpQmUBCVDEczOoSoh31GVM3+T4LVbh33L1/629+NNyNWKTg5URciEIt IN5mNab4cIaIImjLHkzXBK03UVP9tp05URZLjJkn4ZmyT8VFHs2ldAKTkJvXY+VgRTox jWR4VCKgbPpyMR32CpLXBf2mBjnNM/EtVcqNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HLH8Umjek2lJAjZnnx7q2IudzCpbqKcqFWdyEcDVwiuc4ySOg9oQy1DU2EszFheSq3 WWZJ41XaLSIULpnxySJxZbvvTpGBihyIRJANvpqG5QsYHEdXiLoinC8cFSMH3mB+ZXmd lTY0HxrBsHlbIO/g4AV8ziOwth8pA2P7JkSoU= Received: by 10.101.184.12 with SMTP id l12mr14753549anp.81.1270512791738; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.54] ([61.4.103.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm8552894gxk.15.2010.04.05.17.13.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBA7C66.4090904@f2s.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:12:22 +0800 From: Jason Rumney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:16:47 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) On 06/04/2010 04:15, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") >>> >> That maybe shaves off half a second. >> > Hmm... odd. That seemed like a pretty good guess > (locate-dominating-file tends to suffer from such performance problems > in some cases, and vc-handled-backends is one user of this function, > and dir-locals is another, so setting locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp > should really kill it off). > I think it odd that it shaved time off rather than made things much worse. One of the reasons for this variable is that when Windows tries to locate all the siblings of //machine, and in some cases //machine/share (where the user only has access to some shares), the process takes a long time. Perhaps the original value is incorrect? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 05 20:46:34 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2010 00:46:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyww5-0003sr-OK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:33 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyww3-0003sm-Py for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:40192) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nywvz-0007kT-U6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:27 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nywvz-0007fa-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:27 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51736 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nywvx-0007ex-KV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nywvv-0000pT-S6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:25 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:8742 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nywvu-0000pC-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:23 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEACYhukvO+K6K/2dsb2JhbACbTHK4V4UHBIsq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,368,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="60261566" Received: from 206-248-174-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.174.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2010 20:46:21 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 29E088053; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:46:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Jason Rumney Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow Message-ID: References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <4BBA7C66.4090904@f2s.com> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:46:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BBA7C66.4090904@f2s.com> (Jason Rumney's message of "Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:12:22 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) >>>> (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") >>> That maybe shaves off half a second. >> Hmm... odd. That seemed like a pretty good guess >> (locate-dominating-file tends to suffer from such performance problems >> in some cases, and vc-handled-backends is one user of this function, >> and dir-locals is another, so setting locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp >> should really kill it off). > I think it odd that it shaved time off rather than made things much worse. The "" regexp always matches, so it will cause locate-dominating-file to stop at the first occasion. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 06 03:13:06 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2010 07:13:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz2y9-00067J-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:13:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz2y7-00066i-Mn for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:13:04 -0400 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so837549ewy.15 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HG5vrL6zAwc/esQq3Tra9O/kwwfQRqf7TzxN8tueWf4=; b=v62Q6HVPDIl2/qphk/K5EjCddfYX4ZfDQ82vSxgvs9xN1c9ZPkHE8+uo8PXLNsVeLc KUm40BdGjmrG5XVU+0+gt6fB0YqWOd+2vwZvqDb4vUBYeVEaMu7Vay9qlV73iuE3u3Pu PrLRX+zmZT1ZlDsmBoefdwQM+tUD22lsAYIEw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lUR2MSUMkZMAIw+KUPz8i7aKdpMa6DD974+LeWUclVMt4TOIRtVQLklTpfgM++eU/r xMwdhM9WefcFxoxwsJRWbRwXlS49KW3njhjXkie+GT0MqzsZ3Mo+9T/eGQ/OlB+7ANgZ AlYE79DOb4A3yVXJOAsRX2le1FQClvHJZrnsY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.9.129 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:12:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mathias Dahl Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:12:40 +0200 Received: by 10.213.90.204 with SMTP id j12mr3696617ebm.27.1270537980106; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > That's strange: I thought they would slash much more. > > How about insert-file-contents and insert-file-contents-literally -- > can you time those? I changed the measure function to this: (defun measure () (dotimes (i 10) (let ((time1 (float-time)) time2) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents "//corpnet/files/Archive/Archive75/docman/core/docman 5.11.0/docman/database/docman/refobj.apy")) (setq time2 (float-time)) (message "Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: %s" (- time2 time1))= ))) The results are very interesting: emacs -Q Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 3.5160000324249268 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6719999313354492 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6410000324249268 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6559998989105225 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6089999675750732 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6410000324249268 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.687000036239624 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6719999313354492 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.5940001010894775 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.9689998626708984 (setq vc-handled-backends nil) Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.687000036239624 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6100001335144043 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6089999675750732 [2 times] Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.5940001010894775 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 2.984999895095825 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.7030000686645508 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 1.2339999675750732 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.625 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6099998950958252 (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6089999675750732 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.625 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6410000324249268 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.5930001735687256 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.5939998626708984 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 1.0160000324249268 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6719999313354492 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.625 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6089999675750732 Time elapsed for insert-file-contents: 0.6090002059936523 (This is for the larger of the two files) Suddenly we get relatively good results. > Another idea is to use elp.el to profile the various functions called > by find-file. =A0At least for the Lisp level, we will see where's the > bottleneck, and that might give some ideas. This is my first attempt at using elp.el so I might not know what I am doing :) I sucked out all function calls in find-file-noselect and got this: find-file-noselect 30 122.34599999 4.0782 find-file-noselect-1 30 85.545000000 2.8515000000 file-exists-p 780 35.546999999 0.0455730769 file-truename 63 30.012999999 0.4763968253 find-buffer-visiting 30 16.72 0.5573333333 file-attributes 60 3.9890000000 0.0664833333 file-directory-p 31 2.7210000000 0.0877741935 mapcar 31 2.1270000000 0.0686129032 string-match 8867 0.125 1.40...e-005 message 35 0.031 0.0008857142 expand-file-name 842 0.016 1.90...e-005 ... Digging further, instrumenting all functions in find-file-noselect-1 as well (the ones instrumented earlier is still instrumented): find-file-noselect 30 119.71899999 3.9906333333 find-file-noselect-1 30 84.484000000 2.8161333333 insert-file-contents 30 42.253 1.4084333333 after-find-file 30 42.230999999 1.4076999999 file-exists-p 780 34.638999999 0.0444089743 file-truename 60 29.048999999 0.4841499999 funcall 40 21.326999999 0.533175 find-buffer-visiting 30 16.000999999 0.5333666666 file-attributes 60 4.0619999999 0.0677 file-directory-p 30 2.124 0.0708 mapcar 25 2.045 0.0818 file-readable-p 48 0.5800000000 0.0120833333 string-match 8798 0.08 9.09...e-006 message 33 0.064 0.0019393939 file-name-directory 890 0.048 5.39...e-005 expand-file-name 841 0.0310000000 3.68...e-005 abbreviate-file-name 172 0.015 8.72...e-005 ... Does any figure above stand out to you? /Mathias From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 06 04:16:00 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2010 08:16:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz3x2-0006xy-Er for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:16:00 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz3wz-0006xs-6w for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:15:58 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2010 08:15:52 -0000 Received: from 62-47-41-75.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.75]) [62.47.41.75] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2010 10:15:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Z41N191qZi5DxoSapRC7pGEslp0qXoW6lF+aj6x k0Uyroc20kQ7lH Message-ID: <4BBAEDB4.3080609@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:15:48 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathias Dahl Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.84999999999999998 X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > after-find-file 30 42.230999999 1.4076999999 Does it sit-for in this? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 06 14:17:22 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2010 18:17:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDL0-00049E-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:17:22 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDKx-000497-S4 for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:17:21 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0G00800UL9IS00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:36 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0G00729W3MB3A0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:42 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Mathias Dahl Message-id: <83d3ycxx85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:12:40 +0200 > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > The results are very interesting: If by ``interesting'' you mean the few large readings after the initial one, I'd suspect some heavy network traffic at that moment that slows down file access. Do you have any other explanations? > Suddenly we get relatively good results. It means most of the time is not spent in actually reading the file, but in something else. > find-file-noselect 30 119.71899999 3.9906333333 > find-file-noselect-1 30 84.484000000 2.8161333333 > insert-file-contents 30 42.253 1.4084333333 > after-find-file 30 42.230999999 1.4076999999 > file-exists-p 780 34.638999999 0.0444089743 > file-truename 60 29.048999999 0.4841499999 Perhaps look at why we spend about 1 sec (3.99 - 2.81) inside find-file-noselect, and also why are we calling file-exists-p so many times. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 06 22:53:33 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Apr 2010 02:53:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzLOW-0003Vr-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:53:32 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzLOT-0003Vk-VS for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:53:31 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0H00300JXLVD00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:53:25 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0H0011AK10O360@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:53:25 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:53:33 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow In-reply-to: <83d3ycxx85.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, 5833@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <837hokx9aq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3ycxx85.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:42 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > > find-file-noselect 30 119.71899999 3.9906333333 > > find-file-noselect-1 30 84.484000000 2.8161333333 > > insert-file-contents 30 42.253 1.4084333333 > > after-find-file 30 42.230999999 1.4076999999 > > file-exists-p 780 34.638999999 0.0444089743 > > file-truename 60 29.048999999 0.4841499999 > > Perhaps look at why we spend about 1 sec (3.99 - 2.81) inside > find-file-noselect, and also why are we calling file-exists-p so many > times. Also, how is this comparable with the 7 seconds you reported originally? This says it only takes 4 to visit a file, not 7. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 07 17:01:27 2010 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Apr 2010 21:01:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzcNL-0005WF-25 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:01:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com ([209.85.219.218]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzcNI-0005W9-UE for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:01:25 -0400 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so690815ewy.24 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+o6f+f9xKNMbfXp5Xs2ufVkbD1erdJnEO7/KXFyi9xo=; b=I42HxTSeMMacaABSi7wWtsdtnPbMFOI1wpHwO7ipplVtWbG0xUyeCQ4eHxPbBju4ty h3JUMTuqKafsVR/jgcrQkpNo1clKhsciIHV02Z+dTzVU2/s2YEQoMrwwdNQvzl7HNp7f eHVTgpDlZW+HZdl4ZocZzCWsxHuNIb/uWqOV8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WyeA7F8BcIos6u6imaIwrd0oXpIGhFYb7hb/yqAkqxM+oAszHHvIz7ABwzHt1xaYRH Y+ePxu0CKA74pH+ZVQLWAyPp64G2HVHmJEZx/bdY8UsX5A9Ia/PeQTPdqCc7fa33JBE+ 7+otCjEQSh2PvoIElJ/9+LeKIeEbj6ACT3ewQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.9.129 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:00:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837hokx9aq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3ycxx85.fsf@gnu.org> <837hokx9aq.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mathias Dahl Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 23:00:57 +0200 Received: by 10.213.2.79 with SMTP id 15mr2480696ebi.59.1270674077147; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > Also, how is this comparable with the 7 seconds you reported > originally? =A0This says it only takes 4 to visit a file, not 7. I got 7 seconds in vanilla emacs -Q (no settings changed), IIRC. I will test some more when I get the time. /Mathias From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 18 16:14:25 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2011 20:14:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5Nku-0002T5-B2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:14:24 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5Nks-0002Sy-Mf for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:14:23 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R5Nfz-0005C2-My for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:09:19 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:05:58 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #5833 X-MailScanner-ID: 1R5Nfz-0005C2-My X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316981360.01509@g9W+vJQHeeW5hFZnKd3eSw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) reassign 5833 emacs,w32 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 07 23:30:19 2019 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2019 03:30:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvZ87-0006e9-8d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:30:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:38734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvZ85-0006du-UM for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:30:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id m12so4295911plt.5 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:30:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w6dFyCZcjyS9tZqvln2l1s8nSJda4f2b7T/lZMxGC6M=; b=iAEnv17l5G3zEl3fo/tWGT/zLvRVleuAha4gNGkN+PwWhFzMIWXY2OfgC9gCZmMLS2 PQ8UEng9lkIYq0Vn15jDeA4DtUrSUOc2AOKRP8WWtjer/v3r4m7LQYYA9WUL01UQLrLj bKF/3Qa2i7sXL1r5Y2ITQnRoN3dHZuF2ltQwo97n498+WvUFQjKeTQ2wu3KryArCShhV eNhrZ7CgYxLf/H7RxWWLb6ahznAdFjEnl8VR6oVgExP1rqUlfbaopLnsr6luyTMIUTfd auzOjkvq8oTa7pQtHvXaoGvH3zOxtuKLkZq4VMDruZrNlDF0rLbLHXhV/+7nm9LgnefT EciQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV6Ldtwg9tB1aEpd50oEmHYXjjhFxKIF3i+kgkXyu6KM40mdDIn NfQNIc0qw2gyPx05gGPuJ62gozDogtPfVG0v4bQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyeiwMibQTHQzvBzqJ55Ngsd6J53Ip+ngKe5tKBsDv4QzY3T2bGDV/Nx+E5gzL91I2Ghtqc6dQs+3TKxwV7TQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b702:: with SMTP id d2mr11692446pls.259.1565235011997; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:30:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:30:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Mathias Dahl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Mathias Dahl writes: >> Also, how is this comparable with the 7 seconds you reported >> originally? This says it only takes 4 to visit a file, not 7. > > I got 7 seconds in vanilla emacs -Q (no settings changed), IIRC. I > will test some more when I get the time. Hi Mathias, I'm writing this in reply to a 9 year old bug report of yours against Emacs. I've included your original bug report below for reference, and you can read the full discussion at: https://debbugs.gnu.org/5833 Did you ever have a chance to look into this more in the intervening years? Can you still reproduce this issue on the latest version of Emacs (26.2)? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Stefan Kangas Mathias Dahl writes: > Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug > and the precise symptoms of the bug. If you can, give > a recipe starting from `emacs -Q': > > I did this: > > emacs -Q > C-x C-f //some_server/some_share/ RET > Then, on some file in Dired, opened a file with f or RET. > > This operation is much slower than the same operation done using > Notepad. For a file about 80 KB in size it takes about one second in > Notepad and 5-6 seconds in Emacs. > > I have tried some tips found in old threads about this, like turning off > some vc-parameter and some parameter controlling whether extra > properties should be fetched (or something like that) for shares. No > effect though. Opening local files is blazingly fast. > > If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, > please include the output from the following gdb commands: > `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. > For information about debugging Emacs, please read the file > d:/pgm/emacs/etc/DEBUG. > > > In GNU Emacs 23.1.94.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2010-03-23 on G41R2F1 > Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 > configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags > -Ic:/imagesupport/include' > > Important settings: > value of $LC_ALL: nil > value of $LC_COLLATE: nil > value of $LC_CTYPE: nil > value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil > value of $LC_MONETARY: nil > value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil > value of $LC_TIME: nil > value of $LANG: SVE > value of $XMODIFIERS: nil > locale-coding-system: cp1252 > default enable-multibyte-characters: t > > Major mode: Dired by name > > Minor modes in effect: > tooltip-mode: t > mouse-wheel-mode: t > tool-bar-mode: t > menu-bar-mode: t > file-name-shadow-mode: t > global-font-lock-mode: t > font-lock-mode: t > blink-cursor-mode: t > auto-encryption-mode: t > auto-compression-mode: t > line-number-mode: t > transient-mark-mode: t > > Recent input: > C-x C-f C-y > M-: C-y q M-: C-y > q > C-x k > C-x k M-x f i n d SPC f i l SPC > l i 5 1 0 0 C-x k > > > C C-a C-k c =C3=96 - > : / m u u . t x t C-x C-f > C-x k C-h c f f C-x k > > nd-emacs-bug-report> > > Recent messages: > For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. > Entering debugger... > Back to top level. > nil > Copy: 1 of 1 > Copy: 1 file > f runs the command dired-find-file > > Load-path shadows: > None found. > > Features: > (shadow sort mail-extr message ecomplete rfc822 mml mml-sec > password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mail-parse rfc2231 > rfc2047 rfc2045 qp ietf-drums mailabbrev nnheader gnus-util netrc > time-date mm-util mail-prsvr gmm-utils wid-edit mailheader canlock sha1 > hex-util hashcash mail-utils emacsbug dired-aux help-mode easymenu view > debug dired regexp-opt tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type > mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset > image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select > scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core > frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai > tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european > ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help > simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files > text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom > widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty > emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 08 09:22:26 2019 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2019 13:22:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40162 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hviN8-0000Sb-D3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:22:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hviN6-0000SP-3q for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:22:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hviMw-00010q-Fd; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:22:16 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1968 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hviMo-0003DC-2P; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:22:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:21:57 +0300 Message-Id: <83blwzbxmy.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Kangas In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:30:00 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org, mathias.dahl@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:30:00 +0200 > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > Did you ever have a chance to look into this more in the intervening > years? Can you still reproduce this issue on the latest version of > Emacs (26.2)? Meanwhile we have learned that one other possible culprit is the Net Logon service, see etc/PROBLEMS for the details and the workaround. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 23 13:37:13 2019 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2019 17:37:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1DUv-0001bQ-Cb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:37:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:42619) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1DUs-0001ay-2Y for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:37:10 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id j7so9472375ota.9 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ma/qfEsoDA/czW7Voo4cwgCm47Oqv2cRrbA0Sk7SJIU=; b=BW3yEM76ni5c2ogZYdJgVOt/6XGgpI0JrKKMKFRfYCGc+8g4lLxPjaANMQW0ZrulAk +LmQPkNIrUTErXoTfQgispsuYjttK7lKDAVPZwScX86zdnbH76Tjq6uNgxC6bAaDTrxh y9lSQadX1WwwLdMXZBDvoJG9WCrCiHVbtE2TD9YhaVk7iIct8i9Bguds3FFV9QnpyZSN sfQgOmeZXomz9MIyzig5dxrk5lzESYZ3DAntNSflSqEErI7SS6Y5N6kCOxZlaQGlbsiu nL7/ZmYwgYZUfAvBFVLh7qbmY9ipedjsd00snPog48Egh/bbwBgxsS23Usast4rq7b+S 0XVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUIeuSv182cX5rDORXIbM2aY/kPjELAK4gHeKP/F4YEZZjyu8y2 cJZl9f6jj8q1dy+kU2h6VT1xNJ9NFEQpqzM6VQo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyMn4DUnnUTPnRVGVdztMylCbOL0PhFHKGHl2K4twWwSUCSJRuQ6HefqncCgkKEE9eh2iaTkhTXQLF29XJev/A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1405:: with SMTP id v5mr5228956otp.55.1566581824378; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:37:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83blwzbxmy.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83blwzbxmy.fsf@gnu.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:36:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathias Dahl X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 5833 + moreinfo quit Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Stefan Kangas > > Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:30:00 +0200 > > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Did you ever have a chance to look into this more in the intervening > > years? Can you still reproduce this issue on the latest version of > > Emacs (26.2)? > > Meanwhile we have learned that one other possible culprit is the Net > Logon service, see etc/PROBLEMS for the details and the workaround. Unless the original poster thinks otherwise, this indeed sounds like a possible culprit. Is there anything that Emacs can do better if that is indeed the case, or is that just a limitation of Windows and its Net Logon service? Thanks, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 23 15:27:11 2019 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2019 19:27:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1FDK-00074r-P1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:27:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40337) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1FDI-00074c-Kj for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:27:08 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1FDD-0006Gb-5Q; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:27:03 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1645 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i1FDA-0001lM-8u; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:27:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 22:27:11 +0300 Message-Id: <83ef1bk7hs.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Kangas In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:36:53 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow References: <83blwzbxmy.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org, mathias.dahl@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:36:53 +0200 > Cc: Mathias Dahl , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Meanwhile we have learned that one other possible culprit is the Net > > Logon service, see etc/PROBLEMS for the details and the workaround. > > Unless the original poster thinks otherwise, this indeed sounds like a > possible culprit. Is there anything that Emacs can do better if that > is indeed the case, or is that just a limitation of Windows and its > Net Logon service? Maybe we could do more, but I have no idea how. I don't know enough aboutr the reason for the slowness of that particular operation. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 24 04:46:48 2019 Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2019 08:46:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1RhA-0006b9-JJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 04:46:48 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f47.google.com ([209.85.217.47]:45429) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Rh9-0006av-6D for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 04:46:47 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f47.google.com with SMTP id j25so7794026vsq.12 for <5833@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 01:46:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nUONNPqCIoz060AduM73TvyMrNnjv3pA+fgmswk836U=; b=iR7Yumwaa4iP+d1XsMecrYmj1QmAfUotRZu4wrlamyTnnPLyekM3Q1QC93vSk+qD1A qfZdUkQJyfqdO1Wj3KB9so3rgZHyZiEY2XzDyv3HkQ1cyG9tY8O6t+d54wd1FEAXrd/1 b8zMg8afpmP/NpqjAXMdj48e5TwZ5ykpLzBbPGabL+dRwGahFNE6t2q3mOifMDE2YSmb ka/VnCkZ8ku/bRHT24AdehX9QfWWnNX5r8U3it4MJQBtxeOJvI03jOZpV+eKanIa0Z5v Q3VaVvhvGrYpbpDJBut/VMwUgI6HQ/z5y8kI+5wL++60VyFpAy/yNdEIBpYqu0m2ktKf PdyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nUONNPqCIoz060AduM73TvyMrNnjv3pA+fgmswk836U=; b=WDxXc7kwiqHSmp1RRV74hHXVrItsptE3raoK/QjCmhX5S+Uvd1UgmTlCZBIVBQRhpT Lv0EmZW5yms2U64ovl8PTTNGuJ1QuU3aUVT/1VUWmNbO8lMUAERy7gueC2IufdzNhTYh QDBEb31TbOCwUpcJZtpKTzXNqCeYFeCzPy0ru+FkBJKs9JuTH+rmHQOQXOFOFYwAKo5Y rUTyjy0Mlur6gnDOTRFMWxjc3dqrIcSt8wHl81YJZKbHWzdeBGoPqTgWeYXQrIa8RPFV VCoCDssg4RdptktEPqjr97mKhwyImYTU0dEMGzhFPTCylTpuHnTLnVgvFFm3Dlwz61qR 1Y4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW2xH62Sf4fzUxODygEFjsGYab/ViJugJlonWyCFBkp5ybRrRxj 6/QJE85HySisPbpdZyVab31+/dDByXdlBzM0xFM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZUPB3McqQK7E9Knph+sddeoC7QnHbHSKrc2NHZDyrrwW2ufWdXAIRWwPi1c1ELb3LJubGm7SmBgFrbg4y1vc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:44:: with SMTP id k4mr5088058vsp.151.1566636401271; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 01:46:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83blwzbxmy.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef1bk7hs.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ef1bk7hs.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mathias Dahl Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:46:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030aa270590d8f622" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833 Cc: Stefan Kangas , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --00000000000030aa270590d8f622 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi all, Sorry for the late reply. I did a test now, on Emacs 24.3 as well as 26.1, and I don't see the problem anymore. Many moons have passed and I am now on Windows 10 and who knows what changes our IT dept. have done in our network configuration. I think this can be closed (if others does not experience this still) Thanks for the attention though. /Mathias On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 9:27 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Stefan Kangas > > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:36:53 +0200 > > Cc: Mathias Dahl , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > Meanwhile we have learned that one other possible culprit is the Net > > > Logon service, see etc/PROBLEMS for the details and the workaround. > > > > Unless the original poster thinks otherwise, this indeed sounds like a > > possible culprit. Is there anything that Emacs can do better if that > > is indeed the case, or is that just a limitation of Windows and its > > Net Logon service? > > Maybe we could do more, but I have no idea how. I don't know enough > aboutr the reason for the slowness of that particular operation. > --00000000000030aa270590d8f622 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Sorry for the late reply. I did= a test now, on Emacs 24.3 as well as 26.1, and I don't see the problem= anymore. Many moons have passed and I am now on Windows 10 and who knows w= hat changes our IT dept. have done in our network configuration.
=
I think this can be closed (if others does not experience th= is still)

Thanks for the attention though.

/Mathias


On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 9:27= PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> = wrote:
> From= : Stefan Kangas <= stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:36:53 +0200
> Cc: Mathias Dahl <mathias.dahl@gmail.com>, 5833@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Meanwhile we have learned that one other possible culprit is the = Net
> > Logon service, see etc/PROBLEMS for the details and the workaroun= d.
>
> Unless the original poster thinks otherwise, this indeed sounds like a=
> possible culprit.=C2=A0 Is there anything that Emacs can do better if = that
> is indeed the case, or is that just a limitation of Windows and its > Net Logon service?

Maybe we could do more, but I have no idea how.=C2=A0 I don't know enou= gh
aboutr the reason for the slowness of that particular operation.
--00000000000030aa270590d8f622-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 24 06:13:28 2019 Received: (at 5833-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2019 10:13:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41577 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1T32-0000HO-Fd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 06:13:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1T2z-0000HA-Oi for 5833-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 06:13:26 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1T2u-00024T-Da; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 06:13:20 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3766 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i1T2t-0005oD-NP; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 06:13:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:13:16 +0300 Message-Id: <83v9umj2gz.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Mathias Dahl In-reply-to: (message from Mathias Dahl on Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:46:30 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow References: <83blwzbxmy.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef1bk7hs.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5833-done Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 5833-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:46:30 +0200 > Cc: Stefan Kangas , 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > Sorry for the late reply. I did a test now, on Emacs 24.3 as well as 26.1, and I don't see the problem anymore. > Many moons have passed and I am now on Windows 10 and who knows what changes our IT dept. have > done in our network configuration. > > I think this can be closed (if others does not experience this still) > > Thanks for the attention though. Thanks for getting back to us. I'm closing this bug report. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:28:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator