GNU bug report logs - #5832
Feature request: uniq -k

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Raphael Clifford <drraph <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:50:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Steve Ward <planet36 <at> gmail.com>
To: Raphael Clifford <drraph <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 5832 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#5832: Feature request: uniq -k
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 00:22:31 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This might be relevant:

uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-06/msg00168.html



Steve


On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 14:39, Raphael Clifford <drraph <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Please excuse the cross-post but I have been told this is the
> appropriate place to place a feature request.
>
> Is it possible to make a feature request for uniq to add the "-k"
> option to specify
> fields?  Interestingly uniq already has such things as
>
> -f, --skip-fields=N
>             avoid comparing the first N fields
> and
>
>  -s, --skip-chars=N
>             avoid comparing the first N characters
>
> but no explicit option to specify which fields should be considered
> when doing the comparison.  This would be very useful, for example,
> when removing duplicates from time series data (where you are only
> worried about consecutive duplicates on certain fields).  The awk
> equivalent would be something like
>
> awk '$2$3$4$5 !=  p; {p=$2$3$4$5}'
>
> for using fields 2 to 5 as comparators.
>
> Raphael
>
> P.S. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/uniq.html
> is the posix specification for uniq if that is of any interest.
> Curiously it says nothing about which duplicate line to keep when you
> don't consider all fields in the comparison.
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 13 years and 182 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.