GNU bug report logs -
#5832
Feature request: uniq -k
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Raphael Clifford wrote:
> Yes http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-06/msg00211.html
> in particular is pretty much exactly the same feature request.
>
> What is the current thinking on this?
uniq's -k is still something we'd like.
>> uniq: missing option -W / --check-fields=N
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-06/msg00168.html
I glanced through most of that thread, and the guidance is still valid.
If you are interested, be sure to start the copyright
assignment paperwork:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/tree/HACKING#n327 copyright
and to read/follow the other guidelines in HACKING.
2nd most important: to save yourself the pain of reworking big chunks
of code, and to keep review request size manageable, I suggest
you keep the mailing list in the loop on what you're doing/planning.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 182 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.