GNU bug report logs - #58318
28.2; Emacs installed from package won't work with MinGW

Previous Next

Full log

Message #68 received at 58318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, corwin <at> bru.st, 58318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 bartosz.bubak <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#58318: 28.2; Emacs installed from package won't work with
 MinGW
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:35:15 +0000

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
>> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, corwin <at> bru.st, bartosz.bubak <at> gmail.com,
>>         58318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:54:05 +0000
>> 
>> > How much will performance suffer if we use funcall?
>> 
>> This is the usual 1 milion dollar question, we can run benchmarks but we
>> are never sure of how much realistic they are.  That said IME this is
>> one of the most effective optimizations we have, funcall is a non
>> trivial and relatively slow machine when executed at each function
>> activation.
>
> OK, then let's go for precompiling all the trampolines AOT.

The only downside might be build time, compiling a trampoline is quick,
1000+ maybe not so much.

  Andrea

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.