Subject: Re: bug#58309: [BUG Report] found a bug? followup

From: Maxime Devos <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:32:49 +0200

On 05-10-2022 19:58, Frank Pursel wrote:
> Performed another 'guix pull' to receive one more change which led to
> the additional reporting:
> 
> guile-ssh-0.15.1-debug  238KiB 227.0MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
> Backtrace::
>            15 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/k76q0ikk8a7769b0d2b9y3jj2mpaywh0-compute-guix-derivation")
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>      155:9 14 (_ _)
>      159:9 13 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>      152:2 12 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
>      152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
> In ./guix/store.scm:
>    2165:24 10 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f657621c140> #<procedure 7f656de87c80 at ./guix/self.scm:12?> ?)
>     1993:8  9 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f657621c140>)
> In ./guix/gexp.scm:
>     300:22  8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f657621c140>)
>     1181:2  7 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0>)
>     1047:2  6 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0>)
>      893:4  5 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0>)
> In ./guix/store.scm:
>    2050:12  4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0>)
>    1402:13  3 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0> #<procedure 7f65618e48e0 at ./guix/stor?> ?)
>     1398:5  2 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0> #<procedure 7f656a61b840 at ./guix/stor?> ?)
>    1414:15  1 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f65668495f0> ("/gnu/store/063db2n6gr2pqvy77fxp82p0ki6vwklz-guile-avah?" ?) ?)
>    1414:15  0 (loop #f)
> 

Looks like a duplicate of the second part of 
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58149#0>, 
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53736#0> (*), 
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53904>, <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53974> 
and <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/54708>.

(*) I think this one is interesting, as it seems to indicate that build 
errors of packages aren't handled during "guix pull" -- there is a patch 
available for that, though not applied yet IIRC.

Greetings,
Maxime.