GNU bug report logs -
#5826
[feature] chmod +S to setgid directories alike +X
Previous Next
Reported by: Michał Górny <gentoo <at> mgorny.alt.pl>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:28:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: wontfix
Done: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 5826 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 5826 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#5826
; Package
coreutils
.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Michał Górny <gentoo <at> mgorny.alt.pl>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
I would really appreciate if chmod supported setting setgid permissions
on directories (and files already having such) recursively, much like
'+X' does set executable permission. To match the '+X' one, I suggest
using '+S' for that.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://mgorny.alt.pl>
<xmpp:mgorny <at> jabber.ru>
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#5826
; Package
coreutils
.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 5826 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michał Górny <gentoo <at> mgorny.alt.pl> writes:
> I would really appreciate if chmod supported setting setgid permissions
> on directories (and files already having such) recursively, much like
> '+X' does set executable permission. To match the '+X' one, I suggest
> using '+S' for that.
Since there is only a single setgid bit (unlike the exec bits) I don't
see the point of +S (it looks like a no-op). Moreover, anything more
complex than what chmod already provides can easily be accomplished with
find.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Request was from
Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Michał Górny <gentoo <at> mgorny.alt.pl>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 5826-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michał Górny wrote:
> I would really appreciate if chmod supported setting setgid permissions
> on directories (and files already having such) recursively, much like
> '+X' does set executable permission. To match the '+X' one, I suggest
> using '+S' for that.
I suggest using 'find' for this. And there is an advantage to using a
standard command. It works anywhere.
$ find . -type d -exec chmod g+s {} +
Also the setgid bit isn't like the execute bit. They can't be directly
compared. There are three execute bits. The +X implements a not
completely trivial control flow. If the file is a directory OR if the
file already had the user execute bit or the group execute bit or the
other execute bit set. It is the three execute bits that makes it
non-trivial and the usefulness of the +X mode. But by contrast
setting the setgid bit is very simple. Just set it. It is only one
bit.
Plus there are security ramifications to think about when setting the
setgid bit on files. And the decisions are operating system
dependent. On most systems scripts should never be suid/sgid. And
even on systems where it is safe to do so I don't think setting the
suid/sgid bit on normal executables is something that should be done
lightly.
Bob
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 02 May 2010 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 15 years and 56 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.