GNU bug report logs - #58196
27.0.50; ediprolog 2.2: Please upload the new version to ELPA

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Markus Triska <triska <at> metalevel.at>

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.0.50

Full log


Message #82 received at 58196 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Markus Triska <triska <at> metalevel.at>
Cc: 58196 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Trivial update to ediprolog
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:07:54 -0400
Markus Triska [2022-10-28 18:49:51] wrote:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Apparently it's a problem in the CSS.  I installed a change which seems
>> to fix it, but there's probably a more elegant and reliable way to do it.
>   1) Text that is intended to be bold is sometimes not shown in bold. For
>      example, even though line 76 of README.md starts with:
>
>        Use **M-x ediprolog-localize RET** to make any Prolog process
>
>      the text 'M-x ediprolog-localize RET' is not displayed in bold.

I think this is fixed now, thanks.

>   2) The link to ediprolog.el (line 23 of README.md) does not work.

Relative links don't work, indeed.  I don't know how we could/should fix them.
We don't actually have an `ediprolog.el` file nearby in the website.

In this particular case, I think the better option is just to remove the
link and the whole discussion of how to install it, since that's the
same as for all other packages :-)
[ And some of that info is already mentioned earlier in
  https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ediprolog.html ]

>   3) The image in line 101 of README.md is not shown.

I think it's the same problem that the relative link to `factorial.png`
fails.  The case is a bit different in the sense that I can't argue this
time that the link is redundant anyway :-)

Maybe we could try and recognize those links and redirect them to something like
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/plain/factorial.png?h=externals/ediprolog
but going through `cgit` is rather inefficient (and recognizing those
links reliably is not completely trivial either).


        Stefan





This bug report was last modified 124 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.