GNU bug report logs - #58175
29.0.50; M-x window-swap-states during an active mark leaves behind a region overlay

Previous Next

Full log

Message #47 received at 58175 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 58175 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, miha <at> kamnitnik.top
Subject: Re: bug#58175: 29.0.50; M-x window-swap-states during an active mark
 leaves behind a region overlay
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 11:13:03 +0300

> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:48:12 +0200
> Cc: miha <at> kamnitnik.top, 58175 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> 
> With emacs -Q put the following text into *scratch*
> 
> 
> (push '(internal-region-overlay . t) window-persistent-parameters)
> 
> (defvar foo-conf nil)
> 
> (defun foo-save ()
>    (interactive)
>    (setq foo-conf (current-window-configuration)))
> 
> (defun foo-restore ()
>    (interactive)
>    (set-window-configuration foo-conf))
> 
> (split-window)
> 
> ;; (eval-buffer)
> 
> 
> evaluate it and do M-x foo-save followed by C-x o.  Move point and
> activate the region.  M-x foo-restore now gets me two overlays, one in
> the upper and one in the lower window.
> 
> Now try again with 'internal-region-overlay' not made persistent, that
> is, the first line commented out.  The same scenario gets me one (albeit
> illogical) overlay in the upper window only.

Both results in this scenario are wrong, IMO, so I don't see why we'd
prefer one of them.  I also don't understand how this scenario could
happen in real life, FWIW.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.