GNU bug report logs - #58131
[PATCH] docview: new customization options for imenu

Previous Next

Full log

Message #22 received at 58131 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jose A Ortega Ruiz <jao <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 58131 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#58131: [PATCH] docview: new customization options for imenu
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:14:13 +0100

On Wed, Sep 28 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Jose A Ortega Ruiz <jao <at> gnu.org>
>> Cc: 58131 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:05:50 +0100
>> 
>> >> +(defcustom doc-view-imenu-title-format "%t (%p)"
>> >> +  "Format string for document section titles in imenu.
>> >> +
>> >> +The special markers '%t' and '%p' are replaced by the section
>> >> +title and page number in this format string, which uses
>> >> +`format-spec'.
>> >
>> > Will users immediately understand what you mean by "document section
>> > title" here?  If no, perhaps a sentence explaining what that is would
>> > be beneficial.
>> 
>> I would say they will: in the context of a docview imenu for a PDF
>> document, there's little else it could reasonably be.  But i'm biased: do
>> you think otherwise?
>
> FWIW, I couldn't understand what that means.
>
> How does being in the context of docview imenu for a PDF document help
> understanding that here?  "Document section title" is general enough
> terminology.  Using a "construct state" here doesn't help, either.

To me, the context is that this is read by a user of the functionality,
wanting to fine-tune it (i rarely start exploring a functionality by
reading the docstring of one of its customizable variables).

Barring that: the Imenu section of the manual calls the items being
formatted here simply "definitions".  If we assume that the user knows
about imenu in general, one could have:

   "Format string for the imenu definitions extracted from documents."

Or, perhaps, trying to provide the missing context for not-yet-users:

   "Format string for the section titles extracted by imenu from docview documents."

Any better?

>> >> +(defcustom doc-view-imenu-flatten nil
>> >> +  "Whether to generate a flat list of sections instead of a nested tree."
>> >
>> > This doesn't mention imenu in the doc string; should it?
>> 
>> Given that the name of the variable does, i think mentioning it would
>> just make that first sentence longer without adding too much
>> information.  But again, as the implementor of the functionality,
>> everything feels "obvious" to me.
>
> My suggestion is
>
>   Whether to flatten the list of sections in an imenu or show it nested.

Sounds better to me too, yes.

Thanks,
jao
-- 
Nothing so soothes our vanity as a display of greater vanity in
others; it makes us vain, in fact, of our modesty.
  -Louis Kronenberger, writer (1904-1980)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.