Subject: Re: bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:41:25 +0200

Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hmm, that evaluates to "(30 . 30)" here, even though I don't even have a
> file named "/tmp/two_key_system_2x.png".
>
> Isn't that a bug?  I'd expect it to signal an error.

It doesn't check whether the image exists until doing redisplay
normally (and then logs the problem in *Messages*)...  But `image-size'
could certainly signal an error in these cases, I guess.