GNU bug report logs -
#58100
cbqn currently targets AVX2
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2022 22:03:25 +0100
with message-id <01c4d98fab0c6f58fcedab8fc7eb717161d15b5f.camel <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#58100: cbqn currently targets AVX2
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #58100,
regarding cbqn currently targets AVX2
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
58100: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58100
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hey All,
Came to my attention today that cbqn (which I recently submitted the
package for) was assuming a CPU with AVX2 extensions when built as I had
originally packaged it.
I have a patch to fix this; cbqn now will target a generic CPU, and the
AVX2 optimizations have been moved to their own package, cbqn-singeli.
Let me know what I can improve!
--
Christopher Rodriguez
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Am Montag, dem 07.11.2022 um 14:35 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hi,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > Am Sonntag, dem 06.11.2022 um 18:39 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> > > Hi Liliana,
> > >
> > > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> > >
> > > > * gnu/packages/bqn.scm (cbqn)[inputs]: Remove singeli-sources.
> > > > [arguments]<#:make-flags: Replace “o3n-singeli” with “o3”.
> > > > <#:phases>: Remove “link-singeli”.
> > >
> > > This series of patches that you sent LGTM!
> > >
> > > However, how does it relate to AVX2-specific builds?
> > IIUC, singeli is some tool that emits avx2-specific opcodes and the
> > singeli builds of cbqn use that somehw; I admit, I do not
> > completely understand what's going on on their side.
>
> Oh, I see.
>
> > > Anyhow, as you suggested in the thread, it’d be a good idea to
> > > add a ‘tunable?’ property.
> > Will simply adding (tunable? . #t) as a property be enough? Also
> > related to the signeli thing, do we have the means to create
> > special build flows for tuned packages?
>
> Yes, ci.guix builds tunable packages for several x86_64 ISA variants,
> which are listed in (gnu ci).
Done and pushed.
Cheers
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 200 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.