GNU bug report logs -
#58098
Improve composition rules for Gumrukhi
Previous Next
Full log
Message #17 received at 58098 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>
> I don't understand this part: why should we require #x1FA67? Did you
> perhaps mean this:
>
> (chess-symbol . [#x1FA00 #x1FA67])
Isn't the script-representative-chars used to improve font selection by
requesting more characters?
So does the specific character requested have any effect? because I chose
it randomly.
We already have the setup for chess-symbol, below this line where you
> are making changes. Is it not enough for some reason?
>
Prior to this patch the chess symbol block was not rendered on my machine
despite having its font (Noto Sans Symbols2)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:43 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
> > <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 01:30:31 +0530
> >
> > --- a/lisp/international/fontset.el
> > +++ b/lisp/international/fontset.el
> > @@ -300,7 +300,8 @@ font-encoding-charset-alist
> > (ottoman-siyaq-number #x1ed01)
> > (mahjong-tile #x1F000)
> > (domino-tile #x1F030)
> > - (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600)))
> > + (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600)
> > + (chess-symbol #x1FA00 #x1FA67)))
>
> I don't understand this part: why should we require #x1FA67? Did you
> perhaps mean this:
>
> (chess-symbol . [#x1FA00 #x1FA67])
>
> > @@ -836,7 +837,8 @@ setup-default-fontset
> > tai-tham
> > mahjong-tile
> > domino-tile
> > - emoji))
> > + emoji
> > + chess-symbol))
>
> We already have the setup for chess-symbol, below this line where you
> are making changes. Is it not enough for some reason?
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 240 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.