Package: emacs;
Reported by: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 13:46:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.0.50
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Message #131 received at 58042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> To: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com> Cc: luangruo <at> yahoo.com, alan <at> idiocy.org, 58042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#58042: 29.0.50; ASAN use-after-free in re_match_2_internal Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:13:01 +0300
> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com> > Cc: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>, Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>, > 58042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 12:45:04 +0200 > > And an update to the second ASAN error that I could actually reproduce > by starting Emacs on my branch: > > ==64010==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x000107130d00 at pc 0x0001002a48d8 bp 0x00016fdcaa80 sp 0x00016fdcaa78 > READ of size 8 at 0x000107130d00 thread T0 > #0 0x1002a48d4 in PSEUDOVECTORP lisp.h:1110 > #1 0x1002a4944 in SYMBOL_WITH_POS_P lisp.h:1122 > #2 0x10025a3f4 in EQ lisp.h:1342 > #3 0x100280f6c in run_window_change_functions window.c:3964 > #4 0x1000f1980 in redisplay_internal xdisp.c:16600 > #5 0x100107cb4 in redisplay xdisp.c:16111 > #6 0x10089364c in -[EmacsView layoutSublayersOfLayer:] nsterm.m:8661 > #7 0x1900a9624 in CA::Layer::layout_if_needed(CA::Transaction*)+0x224 (QuartzCore:arm64e+0x20624) > #8 0x1901f661c in CA::Context::commit_transaction(CA::Transaction*, double, double*)+0x1c0 (QuartzCore:arm64e+0x16d61c) > #9 0x19008b4c8 in CA::Transaction::commit()+0x2bc (QuartzCore:arm64e+0x24c8) > #10 0x18bee1698 in __62+[CATransaction(NSCATransaction) NS_setFlushesWithDisplayLink]_block_invoke+0x12c (AppKit:arm64e+0x1ac698) > #11 0x18c646754 in ___NSRunLoopObserverCreateWithHandler_block_invoke+0x3c (AppKit:arm64e+0x911754) > #12 0x1892101a0 in __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_AN_OBSERVER_CALLBACK_FUNCTION__+0x20 (CoreFoundation:arm64e+0x841a0) > #13 0x18920fff0 in __CFRunLoopDoObservers+0x24c (CoreFoundation:arm64e+0x83ff0) > #14 0x18920f524 in __CFRunLoopRun+0x300 (CoreFoundation:arm64e+0x83524) > #15 0x18920ea80 in CFRunLoopRunSpecific+0x254 (CoreFoundation:arm64e+0x82a80) > #16 0x191e4e334 in RunCurrentEventLoopInMode+0x120 (HIToolbox:arm64e+0x32334) > #17 0x191e4dfc0 in ReceiveNextEventCommon+0x140 (HIToolbox:arm64e+0x31fc0) > #18 0x191e4de64 in _BlockUntilNextEventMatchingListInModeWithFilter+0x44 (HIToolbox:arm64e+0x31e64) > #19 0x18bd76518 in _DPSNextEvent+0x358 (AppKit:arm64e+0x41518) > #20 0x18bd74e10 in -[NSApplication(NSEvent) _nextEventMatchingEventMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:]+0x52c (AppKit:arm64e+0x3fe10) > #21 0x18bd66fdc in -[NSApplication run]+0x250 (AppKit:arm64e+0x31fdc) > #22 0x100870bb0 in -[EmacsApp run] nsterm.m:5799 > #23 0x1008c7b0c in ns_read_socket_1 nsterm.m:4679 > #24 0x1008ae530 in ns_read_socket nsterm.m:4697 > #25 0x100437168 in gobble_input keyboard.c:7379 > #26 0x1004389d0 in handle_async_input keyboard.c:7610 > #27 0x1004389b0 in process_pending_signals keyboard.c:7624 > #28 0x100438acc in unblock_input_to keyboard.c:7639 > #29 0x100432cac in unblock_input keyboard.c:7658 > #30 0x1005ba024 in garbage_collect alloc.c:6256 > #31 0x1005b950c in maybe_garbage_collect alloc.c:6090 > #32 0x10064f6a8 in maybe_gc lisp.h:5622 > #33 0x10063fcfc in eval_sub eval.c:2388 > #34 0x100640838 in eval_sub eval.c:2449 > #35 0x10064234c in Fprogn eval.c:436 > #36 0x100654eb8 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3218 > #37 0x1006532c4 in funcall_general eval.c:2941 > #38 0x100647fcc in Ffuncall eval.c:2979 > #39 0x100651ca8 in Fapply eval.c:2650 > #40 0x10063ead8 in apply1 eval.c:2866 > #41 0x1006484bc in Fmacroexpand eval.c:1149 > #42 0x10065394c in funcall_subr eval.c:3019 > #43 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #44 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #45 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #46 0x10065316c in funcall_general eval.c:2929 > #47 0x100647fcc in Ffuncall eval.c:2979 > #48 0x1006fcd80 in call2 lisp.h:3302 > #49 0x1006f4ecc in readevalloop_eager_expand_eval lread.c:2151 > #50 0x1006e0b0c in readevalloop lread.c:2343 > #51 0x1006e236c in Feval_buffer lread.c:2416 > #52 0x100653d24 in funcall_subr eval.c:3025 > #53 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #54 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #55 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #56 0x10065316c in funcall_general eval.c:2929 > #57 0x100647fcc in Ffuncall eval.c:2979 > #58 0x1006ddfe8 in call4 lisp.h:3317 > #59 0x1006d9058 in Fload lread.c:1483 > #60 0x1006e1158 in save_match_data_load lread.c:1636 > #61 0x10064e9c8 in load_with_autoload_queue eval.c:2271 > #62 0x10067cb40 in Frequire fns.c:3308 > #63 0x100653a54 in funcall_subr eval.c:3021 > #64 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #65 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #66 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #67 0x10065316c in funcall_general eval.c:2929 > #68 0x100647fcc in Ffuncall eval.c:2979 > #69 0x100651ca8 in Fapply eval.c:2650 > #70 0x100654414 in funcall_subr eval.c:3044 > #71 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #72 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #73 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #74 0x100650834 in apply_lambda eval.c:3088 > #75 0x100641734 in eval_sub eval.c:2529 > #76 0x1006f5394 in readevalloop_eager_expand_eval lread.c:2160 > #77 0x1006e0b0c in readevalloop lread.c:2343 > #78 0x1006e236c in Feval_buffer lread.c:2416 > #79 0x100653d24 in funcall_subr eval.c:3025 > #80 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #81 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #82 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #83 0x10065316c in funcall_general eval.c:2929 > #84 0x100647fcc in Ffuncall eval.c:2979 > #85 0x1006ddfe8 in call4 lisp.h:3317 > #86 0x1006d9058 in Fload lread.c:1483 > #87 0x1006410e8 in eval_sub eval.c:2496 > #88 0x10064234c in Fprogn eval.c:436 > #89 0x100646c90 in Flet eval.c:1023 > #90 0x1006403e0 in eval_sub eval.c:2435 > #91 0x10064234c in Fprogn eval.c:436 > #92 0x100654eb8 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3218 > #93 0x100650834 in apply_lambda eval.c:3088 > #94 0x100641c68 in eval_sub eval.c:2572 > #95 0x1006f5394 in readevalloop_eager_expand_eval lread.c:2160 > #96 0x1006e0b0c in readevalloop lread.c:2343 > #97 0x1006e236c in Feval_buffer lread.c:2416 > #98 0x100653d24 in funcall_subr eval.c:3025 > #99 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #100 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #101 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #102 0x10065316c in funcall_general eval.c:2929 > #103 0x100647fcc in Ffuncall eval.c:2979 > #104 0x1006ddfe8 in call4 lisp.h:3317 > #105 0x1006d9058 in Fload lread.c:1483 > #106 0x100653d24 in funcall_subr eval.c:3025 > #107 0x10072e004 in exec_byte_code bytecode.c:809 > #108 0x10065c16c in fetch_and_exec_byte_code eval.c:3066 > #109 0x100654994 in funcall_lambda eval.c:3138 > #110 0x100650834 in apply_lambda eval.c:3088 > #111 0x100641734 in eval_sub eval.c:2529 > #112 0x10064efb0 in Feval eval.c:2345 > #113 0x100451650 in top_level_2 keyboard.c:1141 > #114 0x10064a318 in internal_condition_case eval.c:1471 > #115 0x100451564 in top_level_1 keyboard.c:1149 > #116 0x100648aa4 in internal_catch eval.c:1194 > #117 0x100416f04 in command_loop keyboard.c:1109 > #118 0x100416994 in recursive_edit_1 keyboard.c:719 > #119 0x100417950 in Frecursive_edit keyboard.c:802 > #120 0x10040fb00 in main emacs.c:2515 > #121 0x101549088 in start+0x204 (dyld:arm64e+0x5088) > > That is redisplay during garbage_collect! > > The change to probably_quit didn't help. Commenting out the call to > redisplay in the layout stuff did. I don't think I understand what this diagnostics says. The backtrace tells us that Emacs performed GC, then called unblock_input, which called gobble_input, which on NS triggers redisplay. So far I see no problem; do you? Then redisplay called run_window_change_functions, which attempted to compare some window with old_selected_window, and one of these two (which one?) was found to be in freed heap memory? Why? because one of these two windows is not a live window anymore? So we should sprinkle more WINDOW_LIVE_P tests in that loop in run_window_change_functions? This has nothing per se to do with GC and with redisplay being run from the unblock_input, this can happen regardless of these.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.