Subject: Re: bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers

From: Ikumi Keita <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:08:52 +0900

>>>>> Ikumi Keita <[email-masked]> writes:
> . Why is the first argument always nil? The original function receives
> the second argument as `extension'. Aren't there cases that we should
      ^^^^^^
> provide the same argument `extension' here?

Sorry, I meant "first" here actually, rather than "second".

Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW