Subject: bug#57969: 29.0.50; `device-class' errors when NAME is nil

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:03:03 +0200

Po Lu <[email-masked]> writes:

> It does say later on that if the type could not be determined, the
> return value is nil.  So that is what I made it return.

So a nil NAME should lead to `device-class' returning nil?