GNU bug report logs - #57927
[PATCH] gnu: source-highlight: Fix lesspipe file name and use gexps.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>

Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:00:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #16 received at 57927 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 57927 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#57927] [PATCH] gnu: source-highlight: Fix lesspipe file
 name and use gexps.
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 04:34:07 +0000
Hi Tobias,

On Tue, Sep 27 2022, 03:22:19 PM +0200
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:

> Hi kiasoc5,
> 
> kiasoc5 via Guix-patches via 写道:
> > This fixes src-hilite-lesspipe.sh so that lesspipe.sh is called 
> > instead of lesspipe.
> 
> When you notice a rebuild count higher than the thresholds given 
> here[0], please add a ‘[PATCH core-updates]’ or ‘[PATCH staging]’ 
> warning to your patch subject.  It reduces the chance of these 
> slipping through.

I didn't realize source-highlight was used by so many projects, I'll be
more careful next time.

Just so I understand the rebuilds are occuring because the store path
of source-highlight changed, and the result could not be grafted?

> > * gnu/packages/pretty-print.scm (source-highlight):
> > [arguments]: Use gexps, remove trailing #ts.
> > [phases]: Add phase to make src-highlight-lesspipe.sh work.
> 
> These unrelated changes should be separated into at least two 
> patches next time: one to gexp and remove the #ts, the other to 
> make the functional change.
> < to go 
> straight to master.

1. Does trailing #t change the hash?
2. Why might Gexpification change the hash?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 234 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.