From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:56 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57915: 29.0.50; Misleading warning about use of quote in clause of cl-case Resent-From: Jonas Bernoulli Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 19:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 57915 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 57915@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16635297436883 (code B ref -1); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 19:36:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2022 19:35:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oa04t-0001mw-GX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 15:35:43 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oa04r-0001mo-N5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 15:35:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oa04q-0008Gf-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 15:35:41 -0400 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:46194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oa04o-00067s-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 15:35:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A057216591 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:35:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1663529731; bh=QHwI+0NErs9M8qv6wHdHfsUr /kguq7CZ7KSgz9ibDEU=; b=1MNCOnZjn/lR3+XPLDWmIgCK7QN5UQtUAb2b0hPG DRWHAlE3/PlJpA6j5XRJtdl2Wt8TuvQ2Cq/mZ2OpWMaTMCr0QcdhqlSHm+soqrie elp8AwL6awoTbtEuGEZfvsW/a6rTghHRc36swCKYXRdDNyIrC5ljd7jBDMLveH3h tOI= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id avo4oiDRfT1S for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74208164DF for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:35:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Jonas Bernoulli Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87y1ugo4qk.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) I inherited some code like this: (cl-case foo ((quote) ...) ((funcall) ...)) While I probably would not have written it like this, I think it makes sense, since (quote ...) looks like ... is being quoted. Using ((quote) ...) make it clear to the human reader that that is not what is happening. Unfortunately the byte-compiler now provides this misleading warning: Warning: Case (quote) will match =E2=80=98quote=E2=80=99. If that=E2=80= =99s intended, write (nil quote) instead. Otherwise, don=E2=80=99t quote =E2=80=98nil= =E2=80=99. This is misleading because the conditions (quote) and (nil quote) are not equivalent; obviously the first only matches `quote', while second also matches nil. I have seen this exact warning for a few other packages and fear that someone might blindly follow the suggestion. Could this special case, (quote), be handled differently? I understand we want to catch, pcase-inspired clauses like 'x. I am not sure we can tell the difference between (quote), (quote nil) and 'nil, but it seems to me, that if that is not the case, we should avoid the invalid recommendation at the cost of not warning about the other, likely unintended uses. Cheers, Jonas From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:56 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57915: 29.0.50; Misleading warning about use of quote in clause of cl-case Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57915 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jonas Bernoulli Cc: Philipp Stephani , 57915@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57915-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57915.16635763378945 (code B ref 57915); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 57915) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 08:32:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaCCO-0002KC-NI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:32:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaCCM-0002Jz-RN for 57915@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:32:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1mi+RIQ1gyPYiJnScfaLmZQn/h0o8UIDo8vNeX8b5bM=; b=nx6jkRpfjvDkEo4AS+N9q5edqD S0RObhRNMGC/tSVyDWmibqWmJc4Ap6cDuNy0qbWEWeh8iQ4w9cIJcB80kSXGeD/5H654pTwwPEJ/+ IAo4LsxcorT5B4KsYcu0E81EOltXwMLmjHrsohIJrzUZJ9EST5F3pFoaxvfa01DgeWrQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaCCB-0007Fl-VT; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:32:08 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87y1ugo4qk.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:35:31 +0200") References: <87y1ugo4qk.fsf@bernoul.li> X-Now-Playing: 13 & God's _Own Your Ghost_: "Armored Scarves" Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:32:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmfrwyri.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jonas Bernoulli writes: > I inherited some code like this: > > (cl-case foo > ((quote) ...) > ((funcall) ...)) > > While I probably would not have written it like this, I think it > makes sense, since (quote ...) looks like [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Jonas Bernoulli writes: > I inherited some code like this: > > (cl-case foo > ((quote) ...) > ((funcall) ...)) > > While I probably would not have written it like this, I think it > makes sense, since (quote ...) looks like ... is being quoted. Using > ((quote) ...) make it clear to the human reader that that is not what is > happening. Unfortunately the byte-compiler now provides this misleading > warning: > > Warning: Case (quote) will match =E2=80=98quote=E2=80=99. If that=E2= =80=99s intended, > write (nil quote) instead. Otherwise, don=E2=80=99t quote =E2=80=98n= il=E2=80=99. [...] > Could this special case, (quote), be handled differently? I understand > we want to catch, pcase-inspired clauses like 'x. I am not sure we can > tell the difference between (quote), (quote nil) and 'nil, but it seems > to me, that if that is not the case, we should avoid the invalid > recommendation at the cost of not warning about the other, likely > unintended uses. Yeah, since there isn't really any other way to express this (or is there?), we should probably not warn about this construction. I've added Philipp to the CCs; perhaps he has some comments. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 19 04:34:33 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 08:34:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaCEb-0002OG-7J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:34:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaCEZ-0002Nt-5p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:34:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Vl77NgvEswO+ih1zuqm0pC3N/IGHlbHD6nANpTa3A+U=; b=RL4CFxsbklnSFHV8g+zit9LMJ6 Bp9FKPAcACHeI5UU5EXPjL8XjhIcFVMVVfraHWr8jmZA/P1Dlirm1/J5s0tj3XxIW/AMF3x2/kFkJ QlXXJXioNPDXTj1OCLP7JVuc8hmsQy+4Yv+eUnJNi5AgCgDwkHtVoRN8r0PvCmZRmSfk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaCEP-0007GN-5r for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:34:25 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:34:19 +0200 Message-Id: <87o7vbwyno.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #57915 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 57915 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 57915 + moreinfo quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:56 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57915: 29.0.50; Misleading warning about use of quote in clause of cl-case Resent-From: Philipp Stephani Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57915 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , 57915@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57915-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57915.166358753613820 (code B ref 57915); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 57915) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 11:38:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52576 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaF71-0003ap-Hs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:38:55 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f175.google.com ([209.85.208.175]:45998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaF6y-0003ab-Tr for 57915@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:38:53 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f175.google.com with SMTP id c7so22102174ljm.12 for <57915@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:38:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SAh06Z57qJc0JfDSckDh3lHh1/KeUPE+7cXlvCWmafE=; b=qpReR/Cs1LaRCXEgP/vNpypSiTAfsKD0S9MfRsKJuTLl9xkpTDa1+UjOnhWdSK2kf1 2Yod1OljhjL/08h9WeUa7ebuLMQmP0Wz/EyYTSPYuw+mX39kGit2fqNC6RSdvDlzXDXt sgLM19etlJJZsaq2ZrMbMQG9rPibn0oMB3rpFWxRoxTnLkeGMkcI3CGnuarFSRhhXm+h 02BOZxu2PHm/OyTLxsBFb8cAVqZRMCGbCOvm8bKYbB2ISNAJogStAPerbpGC7Lrhbbof irALp3P0tYqupuTa+SPYnv6e9orXSLlDvyoVHDMM/+C+zI/XCW7p7OXKhp8f358kAp5M bkLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=SAh06Z57qJc0JfDSckDh3lHh1/KeUPE+7cXlvCWmafE=; b=VjR1jnzzcEvmVIadU4jfLTlyq1ObQH/VIivID3txPaQtp54oRqpRGdSsjeEOw/RPS+ PsqNJHXdWC2vx2Tk3yHgyDBVFsLz4mwkta84LtVq538EVwpK1f0zeMlxbolJhl4YMrO8 yIrF2rW22TSENoXyiBcVw4f4jhpVd0AVLzw7fZJKNsDE9fySD2/Rtly32cv7kpgof3J5 AijAQzCDn4GCKCsC5eULMC0q3bDY7Ul/swIkild6lcsRH/CPMLaLo8r+Uu65uG3ID9t1 AxOkxgK8eh2qASp0iGOzbhjVWB5ha95saVpT3xMiHuKuBiy3QVAG9VaxVlOQjuj1x4pr L+mQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0fLIN5J1Pw5yocfCY+M5whsoSSdfd24PC6hCWrpLQqJOo6f9H5 SgwAWz0OnRbdeCU9d6jk7KBhGZN8jpCkpNXAI8XzHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5PrruoQKRu7x+KQnzbXYASf1sO4oVo/pNbCO/dYp1bWh+1f0CGfjx+PTg439zIVx+4oBoZ+6nUok3eHaKdmpk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:944a:0:b0:24f:10bd:b7e8 with SMTP id o10-20020a2e944a000000b0024f10bdb7e8mr5418866ljh.238.1663587526708; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 04:38:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87y1ugo4qk.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pmfrwyri.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87pmfrwyri.fsf@gnus.org> From: Philipp Stephani Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:38:34 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -9.0 (---------) On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 10:32, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > Jonas Bernoulli writes: > > > I inherited some code like this: > > > > (cl-case foo > > ((quote) ...) > > ((funcall) ...)) > > > > While I probably would not have written it like this, I think it > > makes sense, since (quote ...) looks like ... is being quoted. Using > > ((quote) ...) make it clear to the human reader that that is not what i= s > > happening. Unfortunately the byte-compiler now provides this misleadin= g > > warning: > > > > Warning: Case (quote) will match =E2=80=98quote=E2=80=99. If that=E2= =80=99s intended, > > write (nil quote) instead. Otherwise, don=E2=80=99t quote =E2=80= =98nil=E2=80=99. > > [...] > > > Could this special case, (quote), be handled differently? I understand > > we want to catch, pcase-inspired clauses like 'x. I am not sure we can > > tell the difference between (quote), (quote nil) and 'nil, but it seems > > to me, that if that is not the case, we should avoid the invalid > > recommendation at the cost of not warning about the other, likely > > unintended uses. > > Yeah, since there isn't really any other way to express this (or is > there?), we should probably not warn about this construction. > > I've added Philipp to the CCs; perhaps he has some comments. Makes sense, fixed in commit a71de4b52d3de14349ded7d88c4cae6e2a9376ae. --=20 Google Germany GmbH Erika-Mann-Stra=C3=9Fe 33 80636 M=C3=BCnchen Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese f=C3=A4lschlicherweise erhalten haben sollten, leiten Sie diese bitte nicht an jemand anderes weiter, l=C3=B6schen Sie alle Kopien und Anh=C3=A4nge davon und lassen Sie = mich bitte wissen, dass die E-Mail an die falsche Person gesendet wurde. This e-mail is confidential. If you received this communication by mistake, please don=E2=80=99t forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong person. From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:56 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57915: 29.0.50; Misleading warning about use of quote in clause of cl-case Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57915 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Philipp Stephani Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , 57915@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57915-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57915.166361297220407 (code B ref 57915); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:43:01 +0000 Received: (at 57915) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 18:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLjH-0005J5-LM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:42:51 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36784) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLjG-0005Ip-Pj for 57915@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:42:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Qd2r83IHXmBNkLxN+BNrpZSarWdXNnb0oqcUOofYXhI=; b=fuLHL+XRoYo0KOzHZgr4j+51wZ mSx4cD0FTXNDwxx4crPgyDg9kWRH6Sw4HdF866yOgjjBBAe6fgcOcdUZSoY1zUlZGqWqaZW5HH90D XdbzOT198OQGl0GoqpGn4U1Nmxz8H3U33QwWIyXmtfBLDospDh8kTJZBX5q4jfegkcN0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLj7-00035O-OS; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:42:43 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: (Philipp Stephani's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:38:34 +0200") References: <87y1ugo4qk.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pmfrwyri.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Japan's _Quiet Life (4): Life In Tokyo_: "Life In Tokyo [Original 12" Version]" Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: <878rmfrysf.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Philipp Stephani writes: > Makes sense, fixed in commit a71de4b52d3de14349ded7d88c4cae6e2a9376ae. Thanks; I can confirm that this fixes the problem, so I'm closing this bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Philipp Stephani writes: > Makes sense, fixed in commit a71de4b52d3de14349ded7d88c4cae6e2a9376ae. Thanks; I can confirm that this fixes the problem, so I'm closing this bug report. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 19 14:42:56 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 18:42:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLjL-0005JL-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:42:56 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36800) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLjK-0005Ix-TM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:42:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hghZgLMZf7CkaNeehmOiBr4OJlZqV93h5Uw6MBs3mCQ=; b=DWZyHizbbKH0hyULQK0SSAamnU GWhFhqdVDyTsoKR5DYvMHZOcKU6E4C6ljymJC00YCp9gr4l7yx7wBU41JUG6CLro4Kh+8zQ5L+9Vh tdmpmr3g+g1N70wysxmw07fQMeGNLxMNaQrJf+m7HbHYkQn60wl4D7RJ7q48xFwHQHVM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLjD-00035Y-9V for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:42:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:42:46 +0200 Message-Id: <877d1zrys9.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #57915 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 57915 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 57915 29.1 quit